Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Core Temp vs. Ntune

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    54

    Core Temp vs. Ntune

    I want to know which will be better to use Core Temp or the Ntune, Normally my quad core is idle 60 deg/c if I am using Ntune and it is around 75 deg/c in the Core Temp. Actually my motherboard is defective but I am not having any problem related to the stability. Hence the I have idea which is the more stable one. It will be better if you can give the information related to Core Temp vs. Ntune. I will be waiting for the related reply.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    996

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    The temperature monitoring software processors Core Temp just went to version 0.99.7 . In the new menu include better integration with Windows 7, the support II X6 Phenom, Athlon and Celeron E3000 L100 and the display of the burning technology. Side error correction, Core Temp 0.99.7 displays the correct frequency after hibernation, the recording interval and the settings are properly safeguarded, the detection frequency of Intel has been reviewed and overheating protection from AMD was corrected. Finally, the window is now a little larger.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,736

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    Proposed free, Core Temp is a utility developed for the Windows operating system that can monitor the temperature on the CPU. In addition to displaying the temperature in real time, it gives the possibility to export data to a spreadsheet like Microsoft Excel or OpenOffice.org Calc, which can generate graphs in order to monitor the temperature function of time and CPU load.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    666

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    On the menu this version 0.99.7.3, can now load the application at system startup for computers running Windows Vista and Windows 7, the management of processor cores 12 and the resolution of some problems. Among these concerns, a notice in the screenshot on Windows Vista or Windows 7 when visual effects are enabled, preventing a proper operation of the protection against overheating and a menu on display in minimized mode.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    656

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    If you do not like RivaTuner ergonomics, or you're afraid of a utility written by independent programmers, you can turn to nTune , edited by nVidia. As its name suggests, nTune can "tune" your system. It gives full measure on a PC with a motherboard with nForce chipset, in which case, sets the nTune overclocking the CPU and RAM, monitor the overall status of the configuration, etc.. But even on our reference platform for Intel X38, nTune can change the graphics card.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    976

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    NTune has the advantage of full integration into the control panel of Forceware. After installation, the Performance tab, then adopts new options, including "adjust GPU settings". Here we find, as in Riva Tuner, two sliders: one for the frequency of the GPU, one for the memory frequency. Note that Nvidia does not desynchronizing shaders.
    Searching the forums can help you to find your answers more quickly

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    658

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    The integration of the Forceware nTune is very pleasant and avoids a proliferation of resident programs. But apart from that, it offers less functionality than RivaTuner, and does not correct the defects of the latter. Thus, if two programs offer much to change the regulation of the fan, it had no effect on our GeForce 9600 GT reference. His mill turned stubbornly at 35% of its maximum capacity, speed at which it was reasonably discreet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    532

    Re: Core Temp vs. Ntune

    Overclocking generated through these two programs remains elusive, and does not survive a reboot. To avoid any Set again to each power, we need a little extra effort. Under RivaTuner, think to check the box "Apply overclocking at Windows start-up. Under nTune, think to record in overclocking profile that has been set. Then go to the tab "Adjust custom rules" and set the profile to load when Windows starts. We saw more intuitive.

Similar Threads

  1. CORE TEMP for Linux
    By Sonia G in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14-07-2010, 09:18 AM
  2. E8400 - Core Temp lower than CPU Temp
    By Fox28 in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-07-2010, 09:17 AM
  3. Core Temp or Real Temp
    By Amy Adams in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-07-2010, 06:29 AM
  4. Core temp, Asus probe2 and Real temp
    By Ocnoob in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 09:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,750,678,489.67251 seconds with 16 queries