Asus Eah4850 Vs Msi Gtx 460

I am currently having ASUS EAH4850 512 Mb on which I have tried to play Crisis but it was lagging so frequently that it made me to think for buying a new graphic card for my desktop computer. I am looking forward to buy a MSI GTX 460 cyclone 1gb which I guess would be better to play Crisis or Call Of duty. This desktop machine has an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 with the 4 Gb of RAM. Can you guys suggest me that how MSI GTX 460 cyclone 1gb would be working and how it performs? Will this be an enough upgrade for my desktop?

DirectX11 compatible, GeForce GTX 460 are also compatible with the best technologies developed by NVIDIA. PhysX you will benefit from additional physical effects that make impressive action scenes more vivid and stark realism. Whether it's small details like leaves flying on the ground or volumetric smoke swirling in your way or the spectacular pyrotechnics or whole buildings collapsing brick by brick, PhysX you in the heart of Thurs. 3D technology vision returns and you will go about her squarely in the game, thanks to NVIDIA's active glasses and a compatible screen, the environment you surround almost. And now you can apply the 3D stereo, no longer on a single screen, but on 3 screens simultaneously!

Indeed, the GeForce GTX 460 is based not on a chip GF100 as its predecessors but on a chip that GF104 has significant design improvement. The first to jump at you eyes will be his size, because the GeForce GTX 460 is much shorter than its predecessors. It is also less noisy and mostly it consumes much less energy. Its processor clocked at 725 MHz is supported by 1 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 3600 MHz.

I think the graphic which you are gonna buy would be the best one to upgrade your desktop system. Actually there would be many things which can be upgraded in the computer to have a best gaming experience but for now, I will say that you should buy this card on which you should not be facing any problem while playing games such as Crisis or Call Of duty or world of warcraft.

Not like ATI, NVIDIA has deliberated a fresh structural design to support DirectX 11. It took numerous months before the GeForce GTX 470 and 480 based on the GF100 emerge. The range was then expanded with the GeForce GTX 465 equipped GF100 "recycled" mean by that with a limited number of active units ... If GF100 has undeniable qualities, including its geometrical power, it also has defects such as its price and heat dissipation that result in high consumption and a noisy cooling system. Because of their complexity and the resulting rates, based on the GeForce GF100 NVIDIA does not permit to be competitive while preserving a certain profitability face a full range of Radeon. With GF104 GeForce GTX 460, NVIDIA has a new weapon against its competitor in a niche curiously forgotten!

By consistently placing in front of the Radeon HD 5830, GeForce GTX 460 reach their goal. In some tests, the GeForce GTX 460 768 and especially the GeForce 1024 GTX 460 compete with the Radeon HD 5850 and even exceed it. As we noted earlier, there are certainly many examples as examples of cons to define a ranking of performance. Support for ATI or NVIDIA in the game development also leads to some important differences...One thing is certain, though, the Radeon HD 5830 is generally unable to stand up to the GeForce GTX 460 in Crysis except where the scores are very tight. The GeForce GTX 460 1024 MB offers an average of 74% (68% for the 768 MB version) performance of the GeForce GTX 480 at 1920x1200 4x AA. Always on average, all resolutions, the GeForce GTX 460 1024 MB is 8% faster than its little sister.

In the GF104, there are no longer than 2 Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC) and logically 2 Raster Engines. At first glance, it is therefore a half GF100. The GF104 is also losing two memory controllers and does not contain more than 4, which form the 256 bit bus and (3 for 192-bit bus). By examining the blocks Streaming Multiprocessor, we see significant differences. Those include the GF100 32 Cuda cores (2 SIMD units) and 4 texturing units respectively cons 48 (3 SIMD units) and 8 for the GF104. Note that these have been optimized for the filtering of certain textures. Units Load / Store does not change but there are more than 2x SFU (Special Function Unit) for the special features (such as sine, cosine, square root, etc.).