Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Samsung wave 2 VS Samsung galaxy ace

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    379

    Samsung wave 2 VS Samsung galaxy ace

    I want to buy a new mobile phone. I am willing to go for Samsung this time. Before I was having Nokia. There are two models in my mind. The first one is Samsung Wave 2 and the second one is Samsung Galaxy Ace. I want to know which one will be better among this two. I am unable to decide. I find both the devices good but I am not really what to buy. I need one that can be good for gaming.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    315
    I am using Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos. It is a nice phone. It does not lag or freeze while gaming. It is good if you need a device for chatting and web surfing. I am playing a few games in it that works fine. There is no problem with the output. The battery life is also good. I like the touch interface which is quiet nice. The phone works fine with different apps. It freezes when you add any launcher in it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,221

    Re: Samsung wave 2 VS Samsung galaxy ace

    Compare to Duos, Wave is bit more powerful. It comes with 1Ghz processor which is good for gaming purpose. The only issue here is that it has BADA OS. I had not seen a android version of this device. If you can find Android in Wave 2 then buy that. Because in Android you get benefit of using too many apps. While on Bada you have quiet limited things to use.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19-04-2012, 12:00 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-03-2012, 09:28 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28-09-2011, 08:04 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-08-2011, 11:36 AM
  5. Samsung Galaxy S vs Wave
    By Hectorss in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 08:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,750,706,926.39650 seconds with 16 queries