Which camera is best to shoot 1080p?

[Ajooba AB]

The cameras are not my strong point, however I'm thinking of getting one for the reason that my old one broke. Nevertheless, I would like to be acquainted with if there are digital cameras where I am able to take a picture, and display resolutions of 1920 x 1080 (I have a good surroundings for my PS3, not including being stretched or imprecise.) As I said, nevertheless, I do not know a lot regarding digital cameras and do not know whether to pay money for an 8, 10 or 12 megapixel camera would accomplish the job. Thanks.

[Farrah]

A two-megapixel camera does that. 1080 * 1920 is approximately two million pixels. Therefore, I woluld suggest you to go with two megapixels. It is unlikely that you'll find a camera that shoots wide though (I think), so the best thing is to shoot a photo and then resize and crop. The difficulty through these cameras, nevertheless, is that approximately no control over what to perform among them. You cannot focus yourself, or adjust the opening of the same, this is where photos are beautiful, but these cameras cost $ 250 + easily.

[Karleen]

That essentially is somewhat I've been wondering regarding for a while, so I'm glad you brought it up. In my familiarity, it appears you have to perform an image taken from a digital camera three times slighter than its unique resolution earlier than it appear crisp and noise free. It is ordinary practice in the company of all cameras, or basically bad I used? If you would like an extremely pleasant camera, go for 12+ MP's, they're luxurious however. If you just would like a decent one that captures so-so pictures, obtain some junky digital in favor of like $50 that's 6MP or somewhat.

[Sawan123]

My father's camera is decent, about 10 megapixels, and no noise whatsoever, even at maximum resolution. Apart from that, yes, if there is noise in the images, a good way to get rid of it is making smaller images. Just cancel the noise with noise close by. Do not beat a quality camera however. Two-megapixel cameras are usually extremely poor, for the reason that they were made to be cheap. Moreover, 1080 does not actually mean you have to be of good quality. It's what they want and expect (and get most of the time), but in the end, it's just the resolution.

[Joshe]

If you want "HD" images from a camera to get decent mid-range of 4 5mpx that has a decent CMOS sensor, the noise complained of poor ISO performance of the chambers of most consumer grade situations low light. In reality, however, the majority movies 720/1080 keep levels of noise / grain at any rate. There are a lot of suites of running in the region of us that can help clean minor noise that possibly will obtain within the camera (GIMP, Paint.net) in my opinion I'd articulate receive a charge that can be hacked to support CHDK.

[Madhulika]

Nikon is superior within their higher-end models; however the consumer level products repeatedly suffer very much. I stay in the company of Canon for a more versatile solution in support of the lower range. Also Nikon is using Sony's CMOS / CCD sensors anyway so I find it hard to believe that there really was rather lower than Sony because they are the basis for many Nikon cameras. The more megapixels the superior, put simply. You see, when you get a 12 megapixel camera, and resize to 1920x1080 resolutions, but look crisp and beautiful of course. If you get somewhat with less megapixels, which will be worse, because as others said, have more "noise."