Core i7 vs Bulldozer

[GOOL]

I know that AMD's bulldozer chips are just a hardly some months away from becoming accessible to the customer. I was thinking whether there are any standard obtainable to calculate the bulldozer performance to the Intel Nehalem. I am in doubt that Bulldozers have hyper-threading? I came to know that every Bulldozer core has Two CPU modules in them, implying that a quad core Bulldozer has 8 CPU modules. It's pleasant to observe AMD put out a amazingly quick enthusiast CPU. The Phenom II's were sort of ordinary. So Can anyone please tell me update me regarding this processor and tell me difference among the Bulldozer and core i processors.

[Alexisus]

The Bulldozers apparently have quad-channel DDR3 RAM whereas the Nehalem is merely tri-channel. Intel's enthusiast 8-core Extreme version Sandy Bridge processors will not become obtainable until Q4 ‘s next release . I do not consider AMD will achieve the performance crown either. But they will be distant closer thanks to propagation of multi-threaded applications. It is also probable even Nehalem will have a number of solitary thread help.

[Nutty]

AMD allegedly gave out performance statistics in a appearance to its partners, performance statistics observed by Donanim Haber. It is believed that an 8-core processor based on the "Bulldozer" high-performance CPU design is pitched by its manufacturer to have 50% elevated performance than present processors , for instance Core i7 950 processor and Phenom II X6 1100T processor that has 6 cores. Very little is recognized regarding the processor, counting at what clock speed the processor was working at, much fewer what other components were running the test computer.

[AmdUser]

Considering this data into account, the said Bulldozer based processor must unnaturally even do better than Core i7 980X six-core, which I suppose is the Intel's quickest desktop processor in the market. Built from the base, the Bulldozer design aims on greater inter-interaction and reset ALU/FPU to attain higher commands per clock cycle (IPC) contrast to the preceding generation K10.5, on which its present Phenom II chain processors are based. The processor is supported by new 9-series core logic, along with a new AM3+ socket. AMD is predictable to reveal this platform a slight later this year.

[Terrextre]

AMD Bulldozer 8-core processor the model and clock speed performance section, except that particular report has not been mentioned ), 6-core Phenom and Core i7 950 and contrasts II X6 1100T. The predictable outcome in the document, processors, three various categories (media, providing and game) in comparing the in general appraisal of the Bulldozer processor 8-core Core i7 950 is 50% quicker stressed. Cautiously tested the performance table in the 8-core processor, AMD's Bulldozer makes a dissimilarity, particularly game and giving tests.