Compare GeForce GTX 400 and Radeon HD 5000

[WajidB]

I am new this field of graphic card but need information related to this thing. I have not selected any specific graphic card for buying because I am not having idea for this thing. So instead of discussing for any specific graphic card it will better to have a discussion related to series of graphic card. I have selected series of GeForce GTX 400 and Radeon HD 5000. So want to know which is better. GeForce GTX 400 series is having better graphic card or Radeon HD 5000 series is having better graphic card. I will be waiting for related information for this thing.

[Sonic]

The use of DirectX 11 GeForce GTX 400 and Radeon HD 5000 are masters. What kind of hardware in the average DirectX 11 game of the future is better off, remains pure speculation, though the Geforce would theoretically have a slight advantage (see test of the GTX 470). One way or another, but they are already with the Radeon HD 5850 every game the next time can easily play at high resolutions and details. Performance is on this graphic card generation that is not everything. AMD and Nvidia have the bare hardware with additional functions extended to distinguish from one another. In times of avatars hit movie right up there is the opportunity to dive deeper with 3-D glasses in the game worlds. Nvidia works on the proprietary shutter glasses 3D Vision in combination with one of the few, expensive 120-Hz LCDs.

[Deepest BLUE]

According to me the Geforce driver that works flawlessly in hundreds of games, the picture quality is outstanding. Because the glasses alternately shutter technique repeatedly opens and closes, does so, however loss of up to 90 percent of the monitor brightness. Because most LCDs are brighter than necessary in any case, it can make up for the most fitting adjustments on the monitor. The comfort of the glasses Nvidia does leave something to be desired, and the data connection to PC requires a receiver sight. If you want to play with a Radeon graphics card in 3D, another special needs, including TFT matching glasses.

[desilva]

AMD Radeon driver itself supports only the necessary technical basis. Hyundai and Zalman put their 3D monitors a software manufacturer in TriDef, which now supports nearly 200 titles. Both LCD manufacturers use the polarization principle, passive pole called that also works with Geforce cards. The glasses are different from the shutter competition is not heavier than normal vision aids and swallows no electricity or light. However, both displays come with a relatively high viewing angle, to the high prices and the halved in 3D mode, vertical resolution negative. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Only with an audition site at the retailer you can find out which technique are better. Who always wants to play the latest top titles directly to release in 3D comes to a Geforce including 3D vision but a must. Meanwhile, graphics chips are programmable so far, that also functions that are remote from pure 3-D representation efficiently run on the graphics card than the processor. Up to Nvidia's PhysX engine but there is no middleware that demonstrates this ability in at least some current games.