I have a issue with getting port exceptions from being applied. I have
Symantec Corp. Antivirus and I need to get our XP sp2 clients to communicate
with the Windows 2003 Anti-virus server. I can get the client to see the
server and the server can see the clients. According to Symantec port 2967
is what is needed for thse two to talk. I have that defined in a GP and I
can go into the firewall on the client and confirm that GP pushed it down. I
can not get the clients to update their virus deffinition files. I get a
communication error when I try to update them manualy from the server. I
check all the ports I could and it seems right.
The symantec website said something about using random ports and they
suggest using a 2967* for the port range. Can the windows firewall accept a
range like this? That also list some ranges like TCP 1024-4999 Will the
firewall accept ranges like that or does each port need to be defined
seperatly?
Bookmarks