Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: A new name in note book market : HannsG by Asus

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,203

    idea A new name in note book market : HannsG by Asus

    The Netbook craze era was started by Asus, and the idea of selling cheap and tiny “netbooks” was a good idea and it work every one wanted a piece of the pie in there mouth. Acerthen bring the Aspire One , Msi reveled the MSi Wind and how we can forget HP has their HP 2133 Mini-Note PC. now the HannsG want to jump in to the action There is no official word yet, but there are whispers of such a thing going around the internet. If they decide to do so, it will be interesting to see if they’ll bring their expertise in display technology to the netbook market, or will they skimp on quality to keep the prices down?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,529

    Re: A new name in note book market : HannsG by Asus

    The most recent notebook by Asus is ASUS U36JC U36JC-RX116X Notebook which is an Intel Core i5 480M based notebook running on Win 7 Pro. Asus used a magnesium chassis flocked to get a matte finish which limits fingerprints. The overall design is very successful, however, the apparatus being particularly flat. However, this strength is partly tempered by the 8-cell battery, which greatly exceeds the unit. Too bad, because with 1.6 kg on the scale, the U36 is quite light for its category.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-08-2012, 02:34 PM
  2. PDF functionality in ASUS Eee Note EA-800
    By AbiCgail in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-08-2011, 11:32 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-08-2011, 02:21 PM
  4. HANNSG HH251HP 25-inch LCD Display Announced
    By King Leonidas in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 11:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,726,697,171.88510 seconds with 17 queries