Who will be the final boss in Fear 3

[Visitator]

Fear 3 is the best game to play as per me. But here my question is about the final boss. Just put your thoughts up here! I would go with Fettel, but it would type of wedged in Co-Op because it means one of the players has to die towards the end. Any guesses here? Anyone have any idea on this? Please let me know your ideas and your opinion on this. I ask this question to many friends and get many replies too. Need more suggestion on this or more ideas on this. So please share your ideas.

[RyanInt]

I am going to estimate it’s going to be either Alma or the baby or possibly both! But later than you beat them you will be given a choice as to whether to let them be alive or not. Well there are rumors of dissimilar endings, perhaps an ending for the single-player, a further for the co-op and another while playing single-Fettel, so possibly a showdown between Point man and Fettel. But it would be great to fight Alma as a final boss and finish this saga with ending or killing the rival.

[AZUL]

I for myself want to go with Baby, Alma, or Becket. It's secure to say Becket's mislaid his marbles, so it's very simple to see how he would simply be a boss. Alma and Baby are previously - like, I don’t know- evil. My money's on them because Aristide or Mapes wouldn't truly build much of a long or exciting fight, even though killing them would insolently be something to struggle for. But that's an interesting thought with Fettel being the last threat, even later than he would have been at your side all through the campaign.

[RockOn]

I don't think you will have several endings in FEAR 3. Looks somewhat too complex. On the other hand, the storyline is attempting to make the Point Man feel clashed about his family, so I am thinking that the obvious idea of destroying Alma might become dubious. She isn't commendable of redeeming, but what if destroying her spells the end for her sons too? For myself, I wish Becket won't be killed. I am in fact not certain he's insane - being virtuously angry is not identical with being an outrageous, and although he may have been place through the wringer he's maybe just as elastic as the Point Man. It possibly interesting, however, if he considers killing Alma's bastard children as a means to exact his revenge.

[Squibbit]

I think the clear ending, with you wiping out Alma and her child, won't occur. There will possibly be a plot wind in which you necessitate to save her in order to beat a larger threat – Aristide. Harlan's rogue spirit. That's presumptuous we have a last boss battle, anyhow. The initial game had you gunfire Alma some times, and the second game had you hostility Keegan. Fighting Becket would be a go over of Keegan, methinks, and Fettel revealing the Point Man would be useless because it means one player has to lose.

[Wyvern]

I thought the approximately anti-climax of killing Fettel in FEAR 1 prepared the scene far more sensitive and moving. I dragged the trigger and place a bullet in his head, and he died. And after that that was it - he was dead. I didn't pursue him around a room when he shot back at me for half an hour. The truth the boss clash wasn't a fight at all was radiant. So I guess somewhat that isn't a long drawn out fight with a healthbar the span of the top of my monitor. I think FEAR 2 griped it quite well - it was certainly a theatrical last fight with Keegan, but it wasn't a case of discovering 'how to beat the last boss.'

[ApplePowerPC]

We not at all one time fight Paxton. We get plank'd by him, teased by him, astonished by him, and finally we shoot him in the head. But we in no way fight him. Certain, we see him doing injure on the videos, killing as a minimum , what, four or five people by his own hand (security guard, scientist, Moody, Alice) and all the remaining (all the many, lots of others) were his imitations work. He's going to do a complete lot more killing personally now that he's lifeless.