Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Blur 2 Sequel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    8

    Blur 2 Sequel

    Okay. So I've been hearing that they are going to make a sequel for the powered up racing game called Blur. I personally think there is barely room for improvement. Though, there still was one thing that it lacks. Amount of cars. You see, I guess there are an average number of cars, but I'm talking about manufacturers. There are enough different cars, but they're all like, the same company. Chevrolet, Volkswagen, Audi, Nissan... But, I guess no Bugatti, Maserati, Lamborghini is okay. But, come on! I'd like to see a Jaguar, an Aston Martin (which was supposed to be included), a Bentley, a Buick, a Cadillac, a Porsche, and maybe even a Rolls Royce. Sorry if I'm being annoying, but my favorite part about racing games is getting the cars.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    330

    Re: Blur 2 Sequel

    Well the best thing here would be if in the sequel that are trying to bring motor cycles in. Actually the thing here is that I have played the part 1 of this game and it is really mind blowing and I think if they are thing of introducing the part 2 then I guess they will come out with the best thing possible. And for more information you can go here

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-01-2012, 09:36 PM
  2. The advisable sequel for SKYLANDERS.
    By Mr.Gool in forum Video Games
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15-10-2011, 09:59 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-09-2011, 02:22 AM
  4. When an expansion or sequel flops do you . . .
    By hahanana in forum Off Topic Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-02-2009, 02:46 PM
  5. GTA Sequel by Late 2009?
    By Brian z. in forum Video Games
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-01-2009, 05:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,264,731.43563 seconds with 17 queries