Bad company 2 benchmark

[Tionontati]

Are there several benchmarks out for this game even in this beta stage. I presently was wondering. I have not seen any. I am going to do a number of FRAPs runs tonight and get an idea with my 8800GTX. It is not that hard of a game to start or work, this is not Cry Engine 2 Not certain if you have played it or not, but it is working similar to its Cry Engine. How can it work smooth here.

[desilva]

The HD4890 is receiving stomped by the GTX275 – ouch. Let unaccompanied a GTX285 HD58xx in the lead, perceptibly the HD5770s are hurting terrible too, HD4870 is moderately a bit faster. Looks similar to you necessitate a HD4870 or faster for a decent experience imo or drop the AA. You are accurate to the mainstream cards are being hurt with 8xAA usage but I hesitation if you even drop it to 4xAA the presentation dissimilarity would be closer compared to 4870/4890.

[Common]

The 57x0 is additional similar to an over clocked 4850. The Consumers immediately necessitate accepting it as an alternative of trying to evaluate it to 4870/4890. Anyways your system ran it less than stellar with the entire graphic alternatives enabled. I thought it was your CPU other than you ran the game @ lowest settings and standard regarding 60fps and do not dip below 30fps. When you had HIGHEST settings without HBAO your frame rates plummeted into 35-40fps standard and dipping into low 20's. You were working 1080P and no AA BTW.

[Abbie]

The 8800GTX is actually presentation its age when the 4770 and 5750 equivalent it. Other than a number of slight irregularities, this graph makes sense, not much revelation here, not including if you did not know a 4860 card existed. Yeah those 4860 are enormous deal. For the $$$ most excellent performing card in mainstream card price range. You would get that in excess of 5770 or 5750. The probable for those cards rival that of 4870/4890.

[Adamaris]

Not actually - the 8800GTX has forever been at approximately the similar level as the 4850. The 4770 and 5750 are approximately there as well, so no surprise there. Too bad they did not do any tests with less/no AA – I am in suspense it determines to stay at a solid 30+FPS without AA on my 4850. Something is incorrect with this game, moreover with the game itself of AMD's drivers (which would be category of odd, considering they are partners for it). I have been playing the beta maxed @ 2560x1600 with 4xAA and I get on standard 40-45FPS, which, given the graphics superiority, I imagine is intolerable. Hopefully things determine to get better in excess of the next month.

[MacIntel]

You would be additional interested in a CPU test, in my opinion. How much of a dissimilarity connecting AMD X2, AMD IIs and a variety of iterations of Intel Dualcores. There is your CPU usage with dual core. You do not even imagine this game is optimized for dual core truthfully. Well, this is supposed to shut up people yammering regarding a 4890 being sufficient for several games this year. Even a 5870 move violently at 1920x1080. If this game merely uses up 70% of a dual core or 50% of a quad at the same time as showing nearly perfect GPU scaling you is able to rule out CPU being a bottleneck past a convinced level. And that level looks moderately low. You determine to guess a stock clocked i3 530 would be sufficient.

[Abhibhava]

You played the game with system beneath. The 1080P no AA 4xAF. The Playable absolutely but not smooth at the entire. Numerous dips to low 20's. Hovering approximately 35fsp. Too lazy to get the connection, but the devs have tweeted that they are running on improving dual core presentation and that the final edition determine to have superior textures and an additional efficient HBOA filter. Your system's no slouch, but it moves violently with the beta at the present moment.