Is Symantec Norton AntiVirus Good or Bad
I am using a trial edition of Norton Antivirus. I had upgraded that to 1 year license, and now it is going to expire really soon. Here I am confused whether I should renew the license or go for any better antivirus. In almost a year my system worked fine and there are less detections. The thing that I had only notice is poor system performance. I had seen the antivirus utility consuming a prescribed amount of RAM and it is constant. Does anyone has idea about a much better antivirus or shall I continue with this one only. Thanks.
re: Is Symantec Norton AntiVirus Good or Bad
There are two popular antivirus which are found to be effective under all threats. They are Norton and McAfee. This two antivirus offers better security support. If you want to change your antivirus, then you can think about McAfee. It is quiet better and has a trial edition also. If you renew the license the existing system performance will be continued. There are chances that if you install a new one again from scratch your system can perform better or worst. So this are things that you have to test manually. If there is no virus detected in your system then I will recommend you to continue with the same. By changing the same you will manipulate the system settings.
re: Is Symantec Norton AntiVirus Good or Bad
I had installed Norton Ghost 14 in my system. It comes with some security features. When I started creating a image recovery disc with the tool it crashed a number of time. My entire system freezed up and there was no way to to fix it by forcefully restarting. Along with this Norton Antivirus is also installed. So this two tools has screwed my system performance to great extent.