Re: Sonicwall and XP Help!!!
It is still us same guys trying to answer the questions. There's about half
a dozen or so of us and we often try to cover multiple groups. I monitor 12
groups and try to answer questions in about 7 of them.
I remember your post, but I don't think I ever fully understood the
situation. This does not sound like a wireless -vs- wired situation, or
have anything to do with XP either,...it seems to be just a plain old
networking issue. Please try to re-explain the situation without specifying
anything about what "medium" the data travels over. Whether the data moves
over "air" or "copper" is really irrelevant. Even the fact that it is VPN
is irrelevant,...it would be the same even if it was all in the same
building,...VPN is just a Virtual Private WAN over the Internet instead of a
true Private WAN over a leased line, but either way it is still just a
Private WAN link.
Here's a few things to think about:
If each Sonicwall is involving two subnets (192 & 172), then that means the
same is propbably happening at both ends,...which gives you 4 subnets. So if
you have the same IP ranges being used at both ends then you have an
unresolvable routing issue,...so you have to make sure that the 192 Sets and
the 172 Sets are all completely unique.
Example:
Site #1
Subnet-A = 192.168.1.0/24
Subnet-B = 171.16.1.0/24
Site #2
Subnet-C = 192.168.2.0/24
Subnet-D = 172.16.2.0/24
[WINS Srv]
[& Clients #1] [Clients #2]
| |
192.168.1.0/24 171.16.1.0/24
\ /
\ /
[S-wall #1]
|
|
<WAN>
|
|
[S-wall #2]
/ \
/ \
192.168.2.0/24 171.16.2.0/24
| |
[Clients #3] [Clients #4]
If you only have one WINS Server,...let's say it is 192.168.1.5,...then all
machines, no matter where they are, no matter what subnet they are
in,...will use that same WINS Server. But it is the job of the "routing
scheme" to make the WINS Server "reachable" to the Clients. It is not the
job of the WINS Server. The SonicWall boxes are effectivly being the
"routers" so it is up to them to make that happen.
What I've said obvoiusly doens't give you any real answers,..but I'm hoping
that is may clarify the situation.
Re: Sonicwall and XP Help!!!
Make sure you set up a rule in each sonicwall so that all WLAN -> LAN
traffic is allowed. Presuming of course that's what you want, and you aren't
using VPN.
Notes:
Nobody connects using WINS, either - that's NetBIOS name resolution, not a
means of connectivity.
If you're using AD, and the remote office is part of the same domain, you
ought to have a DC out there (in its own AD site/subnet) or your
authentication will all be taking place across the VPN connection, which is
not good.
I also discourage locally-attached/shared printers on workstations; it's
much better to stick with entirely networkable printers.
Re: Sonicwall and XP Help!!!
I have a similar network. One main office with server, AD, dns etc. and one sonicwall tz. A remote office with no server. Offices connected with VPN. Both offices have wireless access (Sonicwall).
The VPN link between the offices works correctly, routing all both ways - except traffic originating from the Sonicwall wireless connection. The wired computers connect properly beetween offices, the wireless laptops do not - although the laptops on wireless can access all resources within their local office - printers, shared files, internet, etc.
This suggests that I have the network and VPN configured almost correctly and the problem is not windows-related.
I need: laptops using Sonicwall wireless access should connect through the VPN in exactly the same way as the wired computers. IOW, in this company, wireless connections and wired connections should be treated the same for routing and firewall purposes.
Does anyone know what needs to be configured to make this work?