Re: ANS: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permission scre
\> I clicked an icon. That tells Windows
> "run this program".
This is a common misconception people have :).
I think this is the main reason people have a hard time grasping UAC, is
because they believe this to be true, and at first glance it does seem like
this would be something obvious the computer should be able to do without
any problems.
Unfortunately, it isn't ... Windows does not know that you are the one
starting a program even if you double-click on it in explorer. That is
exactly why UAC prompts you, to ascertain this.
If this could be done without a prompt, it would be very cool indeed, and
then the only prompt that would be needed would be the case where the
program is unsigned.
However, this is a much bigger technical problem than it appears at first
glance.
--
- JB
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
Re: ANS: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permission scre
Here is what you should do. You should contact the vendor and get an
updated version of the program, because it is INCORRECTLY WRITTEN.
It breaks the XP programming guidelines. Yes, I said the *XP* guidelines,
which were published years ago.
XP was lax and let such programs run anyway. Vista polices those guidelines
much more rigidly, for security reasons.
If you insist on turning off UAC, simply type 'vista turn off uac' into
Google! I've done it for you
RE: ANS: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permission scre
Exellent explanation Jimmy. Thank You. I now, after months of using Vista and
hours of searching the net, understand the basic reasoning behind all my
suffering. It makes a lot of sense and I will definitely make myself a
seperate user account for daily use. Having said this I do not believe
Microsoft is going to get the everage Joe to go through such a steep learning
curve. Also, giving a program temporary administrator rights does not work
with my very first attempt on Explorer. A numeber of files and folders have
either been hidden, deleted or placed elsewhere by Vista when re-directing
the documents and picture folders to another drive (following directions by
MS Help). F.i. folders from my documents directory have ended up inside my
pictures directory. When trying to reorganise with Explorer (with
administrator rights) I still get pop ups telling me I am not authorised to
perform these tasks. I know MS is trying to give me control, but it sure does
not feel like it.
My only option seems to be to temporarily switch off UAC to get reorganised.
Any other suggestions? Ernst
Re: ANS: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permissionscre
Ernst, the UAC system is Microsoft's way of putting the horse back in
front of the cart.
The convention with Unix / Linux has always been to have one admin -
"Root" and everyone else as users.
Generally it's been the opposite with Windows.
Unfortunately Vista does not "Explain" that as the "Owner" or
"Installer" of the system you are really only a privileged "User". The
impressions is that you are "Special" because in the past you always were.
With Linux it has been convention for years that running as "Root" is a
bad thing, and the more sophisticated the software you are using
(Graphical User Interface for example) the more dangerous that would be
because quite simply there's more chance of a bug letting bad things happen.
So to do anything with older Linux you would sign out as "Ernst" and
back in as "Root". Normally neither "Ernst" nor malware could do much to
damage the system.
Later versions allow "Ernst" to use the command "SUDO" (or similar) to
temporarily gain admin rights (Root) for one specific task or groups of
tasks.
With Windows the convention has been the wrong way around, and this is a
kind of "Legacy" carried on by the users who expect to always have
total control at all times. Unfortunately this also gives a bad guy at
your desktop, a bad guy with a remote terminal or bad software the same
control.
So although I think UAC is a clumsy and sometimes annoying way of trying
to persuade people to do it the right way, it is an advisory tool that
has some merit. It is NOT per-se increased security if you are silly and
let things you are unaware of do what they ask, any more than the Linux
method is "Security" if you become "Root" and let unknown software take
actions it requests.
In some circumstances signing in as "Root" might be acceptable, in your
case it probably was, but with the amount of malware, spyware and stuff
targeting Windows these days most users who were running as full admin
were in danger.
Re: ANS: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permission
Vista hides and disables the actual most privileged account to make it
harder
for users to take that lazy and less secure option. It creates the
"Administrator"
account so the administrator can get most of the access he or she needs with
an "Admin Approval Mode" feature. This way, people who feel they need to
be admin all the time can do so without severely reducing security as long
as
they don't get too clickhappy - because "Administrator" is actually running
with user privileges until elevated by answering prompts.
Making an easy way to circumvent the feature is equivalent to completely
defeating it because malware can do almost whatever the user can do. In
fact, firewall application's abilities in this respect could be used by
malware
to the detriment of real security while adding to false security.
UAC is pretty annoying at first, but I hardly ever get prompted any more.
I suppose if you routinely have to execute strange and/or badly written
programs, you could reestablish the most privileged user account and
have your computer as secure as Windows 98. UAC seems to be aimed
at reducing the fertile breeding ground for malware created by average users
running with the brain-dead default settings Microsoft traditionally used to
get that smooth out-of-the-box experience. They wanted to get people
comfortable with computers. It's time to make the internet a safer place,
if that means average users have to adopt better practices (enforced by
UAC) then I say it is a "good thing". If you are a good netizen, and you
know what you are doing, then maybe UAC isn't for you. There *is* a way,
I think, to re-enable the real administrator and display it as an option on
the
logon screen but I don't recall where I got this notion.
Re: "What's the deal with UAC (Windows Needs Your Permission scree
If you agree to purchase Vista SP3, aka Windows 7, your issues with UAC will
be resolved, along with some, not all, of the idiotic performance draining
issues in Vista.
Alas, in typical Microsoft fashion, your peripherals may not work ever again
due to driver changes for which Microsoft will blame the peripheral vendor
or you rather than itself, just like the UAC tries to shift the blame to you
for installing an errant program rather than actually screening the program
to tell you if it is dangerous.
Re: "What's the deal UAC? This info will help.
You also need to learn to trim a post before hitting the send button.
Camper
"Richard" <Richard@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:252884B6-2D45-4D52-A7DA-64301F89BFA4@microsoft.com...
>I need to boot directly from hibernate or sleep into a running program,
> without the USERNAME icon appearing and requiring a keystroke from me. I
> have my computer set to automatically wake up at 9AM and start trading
> stocks
> on an automated protram basis. Please Help or direct me to remove that
> Icon
> from appearing.
>