Vcore to avoid?

For my system (1.6 vcore default) what should be the vcore. Should I avoid both to take on a daily basis as to benchmark. I have a volcano 12 and got 32 in idle and 46 in 1725 to get it full of vcore and 2000mhz already had the 2200 but had vcore 1.8 and not know whether it is safe (the temperature was equal to only a few grades above) ... they say?

I do not have much experience in the overclock but I think if you have a good system of cooling that can be with the vcore you want, is the time to keep those levels within the "normal"

You might want to be sure from someone with more experience on the Vcore rule.

Even I have cooler more than you and already had several CPUs, a 1800+ (A) thinning. With vcore default of 1.5v to 1.8v that would (went to 1.85v, but the stability did not improve), I had a 2400 + blocked. With vcore default of 1.65 @ 1.85 and my current that was already up to 1.85v

What you can say, given the similarities of your system on my 1800+ (speed) / 2400 + (vcore), is that without major risks can increase the vcore to 1.85, but recommend that for day to day you stay by 1.8.

And about benchmark? Most of the board has 2 but never put to 2 so I can go up to 1.9 post 2.

I think you can go to 2 of Vcore taking the eye in time, because with that Vcore you can know that the CPU will heat only with more than 1.9.

Otherwise I do not see any problem in going to 2Vcore for that, despite the fact that my board starting from 1.95 to Vcore becomes very unstable (is equal to your :biggrin: )

I believe you can. I never had vcore pq 1.85 over the boards, I do not try it.

Attention, also the fact that higher the temperature, the greater the distance between the temperature indicated by the sensor board and the actual (real is the highest)