Comparison of driver ATI Catalyst 8.10 beta vs 8.11 beta at various overclocks

Setup one signature, Q6600 cpu to 3600 Mhz, Powercolor 4870 512 Mb:

Catalyst 8.10:

Crysis Very High 1680x1050 no overclock

http://gallery.techarena.in/data/516...t_driver_1.jpg


Crysis Very High 1680x1050 overclock 830-1030

http://gallery.techarena.in/data/516...t_driver_2.jpg


3dm06 Overclock

http://gallery.techarena.in/data/516...t_driver_3.jpg

Catalyst 8.11:

Crysis Very High 1680x1050 no overclock

http://gallery.techarena.in/data/516...t_driver_4.jpg


Crysis Very High 1680x1050 overclock 830-1030

http://gallery.techarena.in/data/516...t_driver_5.jpg


3dm06 Overclock

http://gallery.techarena.in/data/516...t_driver_6.jpg

As you can see, differences exist. I read that perhaps with 64-bit systems will have interesting improvements.

Would be tested with many other benchmarks
Then perhaps a different resolutions....
Anyways, excellent test

I just installed the official 8.10 and already there are the beta 8.11.
Ati was seriously on the draft 48XX

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lorenz

Would be tested with many other benchmarks
Then perhaps a different resolutions....
Anyways, excellent test

---

I know but I take away too much time with each other things not to do

I looked, it seems that the old ones go almost better on the average of FPS Crysis or wrong?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SUPER COP

As you can see, differences exist. I read that perhaps with 64-bit systems will have interesting improvements.

---

I think the problem is not drivers but perhaps the problem at source are the programs / games that should be a native 64bit then and only then will deliver the performance.