(KB928366) Failing

The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
Any ideas why?

Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
(KB928366)

thanks

Linda in Buffalo, Texas.............mine is doing the same thing.........and
solutions??? Please let me know!

"RakeKiller" wrote:

>
> The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
> Any ideas why?
>
> Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
> (KB928366)
>
> thanks
>
>
>

uh... you might want to read the post just below yours? the title is
"KB928366 Security Update won't install after downloading" ...no solution yet
though...

"RakeKiller" wrote:

>
> The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
> Any ideas why?
>
> Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
> (KB928366)
>
> thanks
>
>
>

Happened to me also. Please let me know if there is a fix for this? Thanks,
David

"RakeKiller" wrote:

>
> The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
> Any ideas why?
>
> Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
> (KB928366)
>
> thanks
>
>
>

Me too! It failed to install.

My notebook PC has Microsoft.Net 3.0 installed on top of 2.0 and 1.1 (as an
upgrade).

Today I saw two security update for 2.0 and 1.1 service pack 1 show on
Windows Update critical list.

So I downloaded and install them. Both installation fail. Why? Can some
friend and expert here help please!

Do I need to install them, and how? What are the problems I experienced?

These are the two updates that failed to install

.NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 SYSTEM.WEB.DLL and MSCOREE.DLL Security
Update for Windows 2000, Windows XP,Windows 2003 x64/IA64

.NET Framework 2.0 SYSTEM.WEB.DLL and MSCOREE.DLL Security Update for
Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP

Regards
Sanchai T.
Bangkok, Thailand




"Help Viewing Pages" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]...
> Happened to me also. Please let me know if there is a fix for this?
> Thanks,
> David
>
> "RakeKiller" wrote:
>
>>
>> The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
>> Any ideas why?
>>
>> Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
>> (KB928366)
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>

I got the same unexplained "update failed" type error. Followed this advice
and got to a more detailed problem description, but it still fails because
I'm not clear on what to do.

"Subject: Re: Security update KB928366 7/10/2007 7:12 PM PST

By: Carey Frisch [MVP] In: microsoft.public.windowsupdate
Download the KB928366 security update file directly from
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en
and install it."
==========================
That got me to this point when I clicked on that link and ran it:

'Please wait while Windows configures .NET Framework 1.1.'

Then another dialog box pops up in front of it:

"The feature you are trying to use is on a network resource that is
unavailable.
Click OK to try again, or enter an alternate path to a folder containing the
installation package 'netfx.msi' in the box below."

Use source:
C:\SWSETUP\AllDotNet\DotNet\US

Obviously I have to cancel because I have no idea where this is. Then I get:
"Error 1706. No valid source could be found for product Microsoft .NET
Framework 1.1. The Windows installer cannot continue.

OK"

I thought that this was the reason that Microsoft created the Windows Update
service in the first place -- it's worked well, until now. The idea is
supposed to be that if you keep up with the updates, everything installs.
Now, we are seeing that the process requires all sorts of troubleshooting and
user intervention. Meanwhile, I will try to get this mysterious netfx.msi.
If it's not one thing, it's another!
======================
"RakeKiller" wrote:

>
> The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
> Any ideas why?
>
> Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
> (KB928366)
>
> thanks

do you have the Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
dotnetfx.exe extract the files using a zip program to dotnetfx folder
and then run the update again. when it asks for netfx.msi direct it to
the dotnetfx folder the update will then continue to install.

Neither Kb928365 or KB92366 are working for me. Is this more BS from MS?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel_L

"[email protected]" wrote:

> On Jul 11, 8:38 am, NorthDakotaBrian
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I got the same unexplained "update failed" type error. Followed this advice
> > and got to a more detailed problem description, but it still fails because
> > I'm not clear on what to do.

"EyeNoZero" wrote:

> This update failed 5 times. I feel like a bad day is coming. Maybe not
> tomorrow..but soon. Total reformat over a weekend.

As I painfully learned today, this is a common problem. Free Microsoft
security support has been swamped with phone calls at 866-727-2338.
Fortunately they're being very nice about it and walk you through the steps
to overcome the installation problems for the ,Net 1.1 and .Net 2.0 security
updates issued July 10, 2007. The bizarre nature of this is that tech
support told me that these updates work fine if you do not already have .net
framework 1.1 or .net framework 2.0 installed -- heck, why would you update
them if you don't have them already installed? Such is the joy of dealing
with tech support overseas at 2 a.m. their time.

Also you need to keep the 3 versions of .net framework on your computer
(1.1, 2.0, and 3.0) -- they are not cumulative. Different applications
require different versions of .net framework to function.

I'll try to repeat their step by step instructions so you don't have to
call. It worked fine on my Windows XP Pro, SP2 computer; it did not work on
my wife' similar computer.

Read through them first before you do anything -- especially the caution at
the end.

The steps from Microsoft Security Tech Support and from Aaron Stebner's
Weblog at upnet.notlong.com -- Microsoft Tech Support actually took me there
first.

(1) Try to perform a standard uninstall of the .net framework for which you
could not install the July 10 security update. Of course, you do this in the
Control Panel's Add-Remove Programs.

(2) If this fails to completely remove the .net framework you've targeted,
then you'll want to download the tool from Stebner's Weblog -- this is the
tool that Microsoft Tech Support uses and recommends. The file name is
dotnetfx_cleanup_tool.zip . Unzip the file and run it. You will get to choose
which versions (1.0, 1.1, 2.0) of .net framework you want to uninstall and
clean up. While Mr. Stebner warns against simply uninstalling the .net
frameworks, Microsoft Tech Support had me run this tool without first
attempting the standard uninstall. On my computer this worked just fine.

Stebner warns:
There are a couple of very important caveats that you should read before
using this tool to cleanup .NET Framework bits on your machine:
1. You should try to perform a standard uninstall first. This tool is not
designed as a replacement for uninstall, but rather as a last resort for
cases where uninstall or repair did not succeed for unusual reasons.
2. This cleanup tool will delete shared files and registry keys used by
other versions of the .NET Framework. So if you use it, be prepared to repair
or reinstall any other versions of the .NET Framework that are on your
computer to get them to work correctly afterwards

Download the tool completely uninstall .net frameworks 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0.

(3) Reboot your computer after uninstalling/cleaning up the .net frameworks
you want to remove. NOte that when you restart your computer, any application
that is dependent on a .net framework version that you uninstalled will not
work. Be patient -- they'll work once you've reinstalled the appropriate .net
framework(s).

(4) Run Windows Update - custom. It should show all of the .net frameworks
not currently installed on your computer. Now you have probably not worried
about .net framework 3.0 since there was no security update for it. But there
is a regular update for it. You will probably find these .net frameworks
under "High Priority," but more likely under "Software, Optional." You can
download ALL of the .net frameworks and updates that are visible to you here
-- 1.1, 2.0, 3.0.

(5) After they've installed, reboot your computer.

(6) Now, the .net framework 1.1 that you just installed includes the latest
security update (Microsoft made this change today, July 12, 2007). You should
NOT try to install that update. So you should go back to Microsoft Update,
choose custom, and if it shows the .net framework 1.1 security pack update
tell Microsoft Update not to show it any more. Apparently Microsoft Update
thinks you didn't install it because it was built into the 1.1 that you just
installed.

(7) If you uninstalled .net framework 2.0, you should have been able to
reinstall it via Microsoft update. If it did not show up in Microsoft update,
you can track it down online via a search engine or at Microsoft.com and
download it and install it manually.

CAUTION. Frankly, you would be most prudent to clone your hard drive before
running these updates -- just to give yourself some protection. On my wife's
Windows XP Pro, SP2 computer, the .net framework 1.1 reinstall did not take
and I could not install it because I started getting Runtime errors from the
Microsoft Visual C++ RunTime Library. So I had to revert to a clone after
copying all the data (the D partition) to the clone's D partition.

---

WTF did you say? I would rather update Linux Ubuntu 7.04 first.

look in the newsgroup for George's
SOLUTION to the .net "failed to install" update

"RakeKiller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> The following update fails whether through autoupdate or windows update.
> Any ideas why?
>
> Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service Pack 1
> (KB928366)
>
> thanks
>
>

I also got this problem for updates from Microsoft got a workaround on
the internet.

Download from
KB928366
http://rapidshare.com/files/42491444...-x86_20112ef50...
also i found two more files which are not downloading.
KB928365
http://rapidshare.com/files/42491488..._3715c8e057f1f...
kb890830
http://rapidshare.com/files/42491438...1.31_a1ba1dc0d...

hashes are included in the file name to check for authenticity of the
updates..

That's because many people are having trouble downloading updates from microsoft "some hash error".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by realcestmoi

Hi there,

Why wasting time on rapidshare?

You can donwload them at microsoft without having to wait;)

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en

Best Regards,
Michel Denie





"nikhilj1" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> I also got this problem for updates from Microsoft got a workaround on
> the internet.
>
> Download from
> KB928366
> http://rapidshare.com/files/42491444...-x86_20112ef50...
> also i found two more files which are not downloading.
> KB928365
> http://rapidshare.com/files/42491488..._3715c8e057f1f...
> kb890830
> http://rapidshare.com/files/42491438...1.31_a1ba1dc0d...
>
> hashes are included in the file name to check for authenticity of the
> updates..
>
>
> --
> nikhilj1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> nikhilj1's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=27957
> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=781113
>
> http://forums.techarena.in
>

---

I solved the problem. I turned it off. There is too much effort to fix MS errors. What are they paying these people for?

I totally uninstalled version 1.1 and version 2.0, then started over (I had to reinstall because Quicken and other programs required that these be on the system). All the updates worked on the reinstall including KB928366

i also had problems installing kb928366, so i said the heck with it. as long as my computer works without any problems that is good enough for me. i know that sounds cavalier, but i have always been somewhat of a contrarian.