Printable View
I want to know which will be better to use Core Temp or the Ntune, Normally my quad core is idle 60 deg/c if I am using Ntune and it is around 75 deg/c in the Core Temp. Actually my motherboard is defective but I am not having any problem related to the stability. Hence the I have idea which is the more stable one. It will be better if you can give the information related to Core Temp vs. Ntune. I will be waiting for the related reply.
The temperature monitoring software processors Core Temp just went to version 0.99.7 . In the new menu include better integration with Windows 7, the support II X6 Phenom, Athlon and Celeron E3000 L100 and the display of the burning technology. Side error correction, Core Temp 0.99.7 displays the correct frequency after hibernation, the recording interval and the settings are properly safeguarded, the detection frequency of Intel has been reviewed and overheating protection from AMD was corrected. Finally, the window is now a little larger.
Proposed free, Core Temp is a utility developed for the Windows operating system that can monitor the temperature on the CPU. In addition to displaying the temperature in real time, it gives the possibility to export data to a spreadsheet like Microsoft Excel or OpenOffice.org Calc, which can generate graphs in order to monitor the temperature function of time and CPU load.
On the menu this version 0.99.7.3, can now load the application at system startup for computers running Windows Vista and Windows 7, the management of processor cores 12 and the resolution of some problems. Among these concerns, a notice in the screenshot on Windows Vista or Windows 7 when visual effects are enabled, preventing a proper operation of the protection against overheating and a menu on display in minimized mode.
If you do not like RivaTuner ergonomics, or you're afraid of a utility written by independent programmers, you can turn to nTune , edited by nVidia. As its name suggests, nTune can "tune" your system. It gives full measure on a PC with a motherboard with nForce chipset, in which case, sets the nTune overclocking the CPU and RAM, monitor the overall status of the configuration, etc.. But even on our reference platform for Intel X38, nTune can change the graphics card.
NTune has the advantage of full integration into the control panel of Forceware. After installation, the Performance tab, then adopts new options, including "adjust GPU settings". Here we find, as in Riva Tuner, two sliders: one for the frequency of the GPU, one for the memory frequency. Note that Nvidia does not desynchronizing shaders.
The integration of the Forceware nTune is very pleasant and avoids a proliferation of resident programs. But apart from that, it offers less functionality than RivaTuner, and does not correct the defects of the latter. Thus, if two programs offer much to change the regulation of the fan, it had no effect on our GeForce 9600 GT reference. His mill turned stubbornly at 35% of its maximum capacity, speed at which it was reasonably discreet.
Overclocking generated through these two programs remains elusive, and does not survive a reboot. To avoid any Set again to each power, we need a little extra effort. Under RivaTuner, think to check the box "Apply overclocking at Windows start-up. Under nTune, think to record in overclocking profile that has been set. Then go to the tab "Adjust custom rules" and set the profile to load when Windows starts. We saw more intuitive.