GTS 250 is worse than 8800 Ultra?
hi,
After 2 months i replace my defective 8800 Ultra with A GTS 250.now I have all the settings since my Ultra does not have (only Geforce driver is later) and extremely jerky when smoke comes into the picture. That I do not had before with the 8800 Ultra. I use 1280x1024 resolution.
Re: GTS 250 is worse than 8800 Ultra?
GTS 250 is much faster than 8800 ultra.it has smaller fabrication process so it can able to run cooler...There's nothing much more to add about the GTS 250 except to say that both 512MB and 1GB variants are widely available
Re: GTS 250 is worse than 8800 Ultra?
How much graphic memory? The GTS 250 1024 MB is after what I saw consistently faster to much faster than a 8800 GTX. In comparison to the Ultra should apply similar.
Re: GTS 250 is worse than 8800 Ultra?
At 2560x1600 with 4xAA, the 250 GTS around 32 fps on average, the 9800 GTX + only 8 fps. Perhaps this phenomenon occurs even at lower resolutions in some places, perhaps, the modification used by you in such memory-consuming.8800Ultra is the level of waste heat and electricity.If you ignore the problem of heat and electricity costs are not as GTS250.Do not think there was any new strength.