Q9300 vs.Q6600 vs.E8500

Hello

I have seen this in xbitslabs, and I got confused that which one is good, so guys what do you think ...


http://72.14.235.104/translate_c?hl=...WY6QaVztXbmJjg

Hi,

I think only tests benchmark is being valued much the quantity of Cores, but then in actual testing programs, games, the E8500 is the decompression melts.

Hi,

Nothing New Here. The q9300 a little better than the Q6600 but more expensive.

The Q9300 between 15% and 20% worse in games that E8500, Render 40% better, and in other applications in most Q9300 a little better, except that one must use only 2 kernels.

The E8500 would never my choice for the price. Before lame or E8200 or E8400 and the ocean. Or a Quad ocean if I want to spend more.
In analyzing what the E8500 climb to 4.3 GHz stable.

I begin to think that the Q6600 uploaded to a range of 3,2-3,6 GHz remains the best value for money (as in both Duos Quad) even having left the new 45nm.