Printable View
I just want to know what the plans for U.S. tanks are. As started in 1949, the U.S. M47 has only the design and the use of it? Later arrive soon receive the M48 and M60. Then come the variants of the M60 and the last in 1979, the M60A3. Then in the 1980 receive the Abrams. Will it remain so? I really hope so. Anyone have any idea? Please if anyone here get anything about this than please help me.
It will be interesting. T70S VS M60 is not the domain of modern times. Also due to the policy of the first M1 sadly underpowered with a 105 mm gun. Pre Bradley and the warrior who had a mismatch too. Battle Goat I am certain will do the proper research of the available units in the game so they have the appropriate level of technology. What if the U.S. not ditch Leopard 2 have not been designed and M1 Abrams was not designed.
Centurion destroyed the majority of the unbreakable enemies destroyed. Egypt had 1,300 tanks at the end of the conflict that Israel lost 900 so they had 1,500 tanks. Israel lost the majority of the M60A1 and most of Patton to the Egyptians; the Centurions were definitely better tanks. The Sager AT-3 and the RPG-7 killed many Israeli tanks. Centurion is a good tank; I really hope it plays a huge role in the game. Just remember that not a single centurion Korea also lost, or at least that is what many historians have claimed.
The British emphasized the protection and firepower for mobility. Also the emphasis on "do" tank that can fight other tanks in both mobile and that training can fight alongside the infantry in a supporting role. The Germans and the French Leopard 1 and AMX-30 were a different way. They sacrificed the protection of mobility and firepower. U.S. is usually in the middle, sometimes to end the tanks were not the fastest, best protected, and had more firepower.
Centurions would be the British / Commonwealth of tanks in the last years of World War II, and none was lost by Ausias in Vietnam or the South African border wars during either. The T-90SA is just a hybrid T-72/T-80 modified; all you really have is an improved engine and reactive armor. Do not be alarmed engineered Conversely Centurion / MK1b of Olifant still has a fire control system Beter though may be slower, but as shown Israelis speed is not everything!
Isreal lost big in the Sinai for having the misconception that they no longer needed the support of infantry! They argued that in reckoning himself against the Syrians do so in part to lack of training from Syria and the Druze on the Israeli side, and then young King Hussien Jordians with only four viable (trained British) Divisions, not willing to use them because of two treaties signed by his grandfather, the agreement of 1917 and then treated from 1919 to grant all of the lands Israel currently occupy even from today!
When comparing the U.S. vs. Soviet tank - that forgetting a very important thing (and BG) - Soviet tanks was higher than most of the time the U.S. at the time or the protection of the armor (but yes, it is still permeable to Arms), but the lack (especially after 1960) in targeting systems (but this was solved after the fall of the Soviet Union and eventually, after 2000 + Russians have more or less comparable guidance systems). And for "home use only" SU tanks was fired guided missiles equpos by gunshot, which give them advantage in the long-range combat, even the Best U.S. tanks at the time, but the Russian advantage is lost, after all their missiles will be used.