Looking for Sharpest P&S camera that can shoot HD Video within price range of $399

[Sach-Het]

I have T2i and sold it as it was stumpy. I am planning to get Canon digital cameras. Now is the time for a face in the entire budget of $ 399. I am a photographer in the world through photography. I adore snapping images / pictures. I gaze for a new p & s fine with support of good clear pictures and video recording in HD hatred. I do not care much about video cameras. Would any provide me a list of recording high definition video camcorder within the budget? Please help me.

[Cruzz]

You in hunt of a digital SLR camera and with it some P & S that almost equates to high-definition video. But for that I say it's Full HD and HD standard. If you want Full HD, crisp, fast action / time among shots, fast, continuously - as far as I identify - and I have three bridges, including zoom and Fuji HS10 SX10 - not all come in one package. If you want a good video - forget the HS10 - a high-definition customary, but the controls are terrible. What images are fine - if you lose your car and the Program, and "say to do."

[BansiJ]

For an excellent video - HD standard - Canon SX30 and ... However, it has 14Mpix a 1/2.3 "sensor - noise at ISO 400 there is no funny pictures in good light are suitable - The HS10 is improved than the low beam / high ISO The SX30 is 1.3fps continuous - HS10 12/7/5/3fps JPEG, RAW and RAW + JPEG 5/3fps The SX30 has no RAW or JPEG superfine done with CHDK -. Series - but not fine steady you could look at -. Panasonic FZ100 has 2 levels of HD video, good and fast continuous RAW JPEG, and a very adequate, if not surprising. It has more options and configurations that Fuji HS10, criticism and specification sheets.

[Illinois]

I have the S95 and very happy with the results I am getting into my photos and videos, plus it is very compact, so you can constantly take digital SLR camera. I think for a P & S to swap a digital SLR camera to be looking at the G12. I mainly like the ergonomics, but a lot of people are obviously very well with them. I feel it gives the best set of features and excellent opportunity to get sharp images and perhaps buy about $ 400.

[Kickapoo]

I found that people only have a camera and take pictures and the photos are soft happy with it. But in this case, clearly none of the factors in buying the camera, I consider. You buy a P & S shooting the portability and minimalism it offers in evaluation to a DSLR. I do not think the sharpness is that is relevant to the photographic process (as a spectator or AF-phase may be) or the final product (prick images are not automatically more).

[Delaware]

A few - not all - P & S cameras are capable of more than strong enough pictures. I have not seen too many complaints about the Canon G-series images. The G series cameras are "specialists", however - about the mainly at length used P & S cameras. The latest bridge camera Canon "JPEG good," unmodified, is the SX10 - and made on the basis of a good lens configuration, a 1/2.3 "sensor noise 10Mpix fairly low ISO 400, for use in 800, and receivers are the greatest people and less than 12 14Mpix - but the same size 1/2.3 "- SX20 and SX30 sensors cases. That could be a "marginal" difference in a P & S - but it's there.

[Alejandro80]

The SX10 only "becomes clearer, better color, etc," the images from the camera - but - if stored in the rule does not, Superior, JPEG - images are so similar to SX20s, which often have to see the dimensions - 4000 x 3000 SX20 says it is - to say "the camera." And yes, I have hundreds of photos with my friend SX20, usually with the SX10 take pictures with it, under identical conditions. It seems that, it makes an even larger difference with the SX20 SX30 with the perception of sharpness / visual and color.