Feedback for Canon Rebel T3i/EOS 600D

[Zilar]

Hello guys yesterday I try to find some information about Canon Rebel T3i / EOS 600D announced and previewed. I got some interesting information about that it’s providing many good features. Even I found something interesting about its 600mm and 500mm F/4l IS II USM. So I am very much impressed by this Canon Rebel T3i/EOS 600D. And it also contains a speedlite feature which looks very different, according to me. What you guys thinking about this. Do replies I am waiting for your replies. Thank you.

[switchblade327]

I doubt if this splitting of the model line 600/1100 indication the beginning of two models for each line through one used for the Americas and an additional for the EU. It has been rumored from the time when the last NAB demonstrate that Canon would appear into extending the clip length by getting absent since FAT and splitting the model line to obtain in the order of the EU 30 minute restriction on tiny camcorders, if as a result American users may at the present perceive the 2900 clip length restriction detached in the bodies offered over at this point.

[BansiJ]

Nothing in reality exciting IMHO, apart from for the EF 200-400mm, which seem interesting? It is regarding time someone added in a fixed TC hooked on a fricken' tele lens!! Spiratone used to build vari-converters you possibly will attach and contain a 1.4x/2x/3x TC just twist and your selection as well as a only some who finished macro converters which were a 2x TC + Macro ET every built into one, Pangor is an astonishing one. Not at all figured out why no one modified that technology for utilize in modern equipment! Score 1 for Canon in conclusion!

[Antonio1]

I will be nervous to observe the price point and IQ it be able to produce, since it has various seriously hard competition in that focal range at the entire kinds of dissimilar price points, Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX DG HSM, Sigma 120-400mm OS DG HSM ($889), Sigma 150-500mm OS DG HSM ($976), ($1,040, other than non-IS/OS), Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG IF HSM OS, Sigma 50-500mm F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM ($1,467). Not a great deal out there even at present competes through these lenses.

[Ceesar]

if you talking about a tele-extender in a full frame 35mm camera the number is the multiplier of the length of the lens that the cameraman be supposed to be used to conclude the correct lens for the shot. For a list of display device the number is a divisor of the length of the lens that the cameraman should be used to determine the correct lens for the shot. For example, if my shot needs a lens 100 and all I have is a full frame body and a 70mm lens, which can take a supplement of 1.4 and a 100 mm lens with a factor T 2 to 2.5 in other words, the addition of two full stops or more of loss of light presented to the sensor. And if I have to say that a body 1.6 and need an injection of 100 mm I'll split this relationship in the required mm and reach a 62.5 mm lens. However, if this lens is designed for a full-frame sensor that exhibits the same loss, or even more due to over-light the size of the sensor.

[Kickapoo]

I comprise TC 1.4x, 2x or even 3x AF TC (x2 actually) through M42 adapters. 3x I be capable of add Chinon TC to my Novoflex 400 mm f / 5.6 to obtain a 1200mm f/16 or so, maybe a little less, and acquire very functional images with good light, apparently. I am able to add to my 2x my Sigma 70-200mm f / 2.8 and receive 140-400mm f/5.6 lens. Be able to even use it on my Sigma 50mm f/2.8 macro in support of longer focal length and fine images too. I used to employ a 1.4x TC on my Sigma 70-300mm non-apo and non-DG and it worked great in the company of enough light of course.