Comparison of driver ATI Catalyst 8.10 beta vs 8.11 beta at various overclocks

[SUpER CoP]

Setup one signature, Q6600 cpu to 3600 Mhz, Powercolor 4870 512 Mb:

Catalyst 8.10:

Crysis Very High 1680x1050 no overclock




Crysis Very High 1680x1050 overclock 830-1030




3dm06 Overclock

[SUpER CoP]

Catalyst 8.11:

Crysis Very High 1680x1050 no overclock




Crysis Very High 1680x1050 overclock 830-1030




3dm06 Overclock

[SUpER CoP]

As you can see, differences exist. I read that perhaps with 64-bit systems will have interesting improvements.

[lorenz]

Would be tested with many other benchmarks
Then perhaps a different resolutions....
Anyways, excellent test

[JAMES_911]

I just installed the official 8.10 and already there are the beta 8.11.
Ati was seriously on the draft 48XX

[SUpER CoP]

Would be tested with many other benchmarks
Then perhaps a different resolutions....
Anyways, excellent test

I know but I take away too much time with each other things not to do

[.:MUNDITO:.]

I looked, it seems that the old ones go almost better on the average of FPS Crysis or wrong?

[Viceman]

As you can see, differences exist. I read that perhaps with 64-bit systems will have interesting improvements.

I think the problem is not drivers but perhaps the problem at source are the programs / games that should be a native 64bit then and only then will deliver the performance.