Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Resolution too low of Webcam in Fedora

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    15

    Resolution too low of Webcam in Fedora

    I, having a standard Fedora-13 system (at home), to which my webcam xawtv working smoothly. She uses the uvcvideo modules, it is a 2.6.33er kernel on it and the camera creates a proper resolution of 640x480. The same camera on a Fedora 8 system (headless, limited to the minimum necessary) provides only 176x144 pixels, which is not really fair, and throws an error message :
    ioctl: VIDIOC_DQBUF (index = 0; type = VIDEO_CAPTURE; bytes used = 0, flags = 0x0 [] field = ANY;; timecode.type = 0; timecode.flags = 0; timecode.frames = 0; timecode.seconds = 0 ; timecode.minutes = 0; timecode.hours = 0; timecode.userbits = ""; sequence = 0; memory = unknown): Invalid argument
    This system runs a home-made kernel 2.6.33.5 with fixed built-in modules uvcvideo, i2c-core, v4l1 and v4l2. The output of v4l-info, this camera is the same for both systems - to the end with the resolution of course. So what you members think about resolving this issue.?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    537

    Re: Resolution too low of Webcam in Fedora

    Try it with the drivers as a module, perhaps what has changed in the way of initialization. Compare whether there are differences, as the software from fedora-13 <-> fedora-8 asking the device, zBsp. Other default values in the source of the vanilla-module. Also looking at the error message, it seems the request for the module from the standard kernel made fedora8. You can adjust the settings of output to play around, respectively the level of the kernel debug output. Or else you may have a different version of the software used xawtv.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    255

    Re: Resolution too low of Webcam in Fedora

    Have you tried to download the new version of xawtv. Maybe just a newer version helps xawtv, to resolve the problem that you are getting. Perhaps we may be able with a not so current version of the program / libraries, perhaps the direct successor or similar distribution? Just the newer binary (+ its app-defaults) try? If there is a relatively simple option setting of the program does not succeed remains to upgrade the distribution? In existence for something like Fedora backports of debian-stable? Even the new version is not helping you out to resolve, then perhaps the fault lies not with xawtv, but rather in libraries.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    15

    Re: Resolution too low of Webcam in Fedora

    xawtv is the same for years before in version 3.95 and is also the same as F8 to F13. Funnily enough, the place uvcmodul apparently the best resolution in F8 did not even - at least tells me that the debug output. It seems that any unpleasant term kernel problem to be. This has been canceled, the binaries from F9 run not on the CPU of the box (an older VIA processor). Also I would like to add that there is no Fedora for backports of debian-stable. On the software is all OK, the kernel and the module uvcvideo work exactly as desired. The cause is the USB interface, which is actually the expected resolutions simply too slow (1.1 instead of 2.0).

Similar Threads

  1. What is the Maximum resolution of Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920
    By Farren in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 16-03-2012, 11:37 PM
  2. Cannot use 320x240 (QVGA) resolution with Logitech c300 webcam
    By Zshawn in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16-03-2012, 10:52 PM
  3. Resolution of Logitech C270 HD Webcam is messed up
    By Dinkar P in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-07-2011, 10:14 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-12-2010, 03:12 PM
  5. Regulating the resolution of screen under Fedora Core?
    By garman in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 10:08 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,713,931,458.43726 seconds with 17 queries