Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    46

    AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    I am working with the workstation that is going to be utilized with for virtualization with the help of the primarily VMWare workstation. For me, this is hard to find some benchmarks used with these particular CPUs with the VM workloads. Other than this, the system will be with 32GB RAM and either 2x300GB 15K SAS RAID0 otherwise 512GB SSD. Can you help me to select any one of these two?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    388

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    My suggestion to you is to get the ecc ram and go for the AMD out of these two. I am telling you this because it will be useful for you to overclocking and get the ecc. Other than this, you can also get the socket g34 system which is having with 8 core chips. You will get that about $175-200 a chip.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    473

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    How much power you really need? Two cores? Four? The answer, as always, depends on what you do with your computer. We have seen that most of the games work best on systems with at least three cores, and we know that many video editing applications are able to exploit all the power that a system can offer. The key to a proper system is therefore a balance that will prevent bottlenecks. The base of the Bulldozer architecture is the use of technology Cluster Multi-threading (MT). An 8-core processor is actually composed of four modules. Within a module, both cores share a number of components.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    415

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    According to AMD, the two cores within a module would get 80% performance of two full cores for significant savings in terms of area on the chip and consumption. Many other changes were made, both in terms of processing units themselves that the cache subsystem, including a view of enabling the architecture to achieve a high level of frequency.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    470

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    I think that Intel Core i7-2600K will be better choice for you. This is having good integrated graphics. The new graphics unit is a highlight of the processor. A separate memory is missing but this has the graphics core via the ring system direct access to the LLC. For texture creation, this is also pinches off a part of memory. Intel has succeeded with its Sandy Bridge architecture is a big hit. Instead of concentrating on more cores or higher GHz, the company has invested in useful features.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    350

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    We also note the appearance of some specific instructions, grouped under the name of XOP, and FMA4 CVT16. These instruction sets actually correspond to SSE5 (announced by AMD in 2007 but never implemented) to suit the format AVX.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    379

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    The FX-8150 processor from AMD's FX-series (code-named "Zambezi") is based on the powerful AMD Bulldozer architecture, which provides up to 30% more power than the older generation, like the Phenom II. The architecture is a complete rewrite and uses a modular design: A Bulldozer module contains two CPU cores and a control logic, L2 cache and FPU. Through integration of multiple modules on a single die includes the FX-series processors with 4, 6 or 8 cores. The FX-8000 series has four modules, and thus is a native Octa-core CPU with 8 MB of L2 and 8MB L3 cache. The revised dual-channel memory controller supports up to four modules and speeds up to DDR3-1866th The CPU itself has many new features such as SSE4.2, AES, CLMUL, AVX, XOP, FMA4, CVT16 and Turbo Core 2.0, which allows for dynamic clock adjustment depending on the load state of the nuclei. The AMD FX-8150 for Socket AM3 operates at 3.6 GHz standard clock which can be increased with Turbo Core up to 4.2 GHz.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    449

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    The Intel Turbo Boost Technology is again present in Intel Core i7-2600K but in version 2.0. It allows you to benefit from extra power when you need it! This increases the CPU frequency using the thermal and electrical reserves allowing you a much better responsiveness for multitasking.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    261

    Re: AMD FX-8150 vs. Intel Core i7-2600K for VMWare Workstation

    These CPUs are also fully unlocked to the delight of all overclockers and, like the Phenom II models that aim to replace, in addition to core x86 integrate a memory controller and bus Hypertranport but no graphics core, as is the case for the APU A-series and the CPU rival Intel Sandy Bridge.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-03-2012, 11:34 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-08-2011, 12:02 AM
  3. Any new releases after Intel core i7 2600k?
    By Rahas in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29-05-2011, 10:50 AM
  4. Considering switching from Intel Core i5-2500K to Intel Core i7-2600k
    By Jagad in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21-03-2011, 10:34 AM
  5. Intel Core i7 2600K and Core i5 2500K
    By The$Hulk in forum Reviews
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 05:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,715,664,945.22371 seconds with 17 queries