Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    127

    Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I have heard that the new AMD Bulldozer's have arrived in the market and they are as followed FX-8150, FX-8120 & FX-6100.I just want to know that that which one is better among these and what is their price. Is there anyone who has an idea about the same by now and can suggest me to choose the best among them? Any suggestion for this will be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    388

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I think that the AMD FX-8150 Zambezi 3.6GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor FD8150FRGUBOX will be better than the FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz 8MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core and the FX-6100 Zambezi 3.3GHz 6MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core but then it will also cost you more as compared to them. You can get it for $280 approximately and it gives you the following:
    • L2 Cache: 8MB
    • L3 Cache: 8MB

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    473

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I am using the same and I agree that the AMD FX-8150 Zambezi 3.6GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor FD8150FRGUBOX is better as it is has L2 Cache: 8MB and L3 Cache: 8MB.I will also like to inform you that it is the industry only priced 8-core processor in this range and it is unlocked as well as overclockable from factory and it really gives you a excellent performance and it really gives an advance performance with lower power requirements and it is also capable of giving Maximum multitasking and unrestrained data flow as well. Even I will suggest you to get the same

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    415

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I have recently got the AMD FX-6100 Zambezi 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core Desktop Processor FD6100WMGUSBX and it will cost you around $189 and I think that it is really better at this range and it gives you a L2 Cache: 6MB and L3 Cache: 8MB and as compared to the AMD FX-8150 Zambezi 3.6GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor FD8150FRGUBOX which gives L2 Cache: 8MB and L3 Cache: 8MB.I think that there is not much difference between the their performance but there is a good difference between their price. So I will suggest you to get the AMD FX-6100 Zambezi 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core Desktop Processor FD6100WMGUSBX.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    470

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I will suggest you to get the AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor FD8120FRGUBOX it will cost you around $233.67 and I think that there won’t be much difference in its performance as compared to the FX-8150 as even it is gives a L2 Cache: 8MB and L3 Cache: 8MB and you will get this at a cheaper price than that of FX-8150 which is said to be $280 approximately but you will have to check the stock if it would be available as I have found it out of stock on some of the websites.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    350

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I have found the following on the TigerDirect website:
    • FX-8150 Zambezi 3.6GHz 8MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core ($260)
    • FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz 8MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core ($220)
    • FX-6100 Zambezi 3.3GHz 6MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core($190)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    379

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    You can get then at the following prices in the NCIX website:
    • FX-8150 Zambezi 3.6GHz 8MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core ($289 )
    • FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz 8MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core ($239)
    • FX-6100 Zambezi 3.3GHz 6MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core($203 )

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    259

    Re: Which one is better from the new AMD Bulldozer’s FX-8150/ FX-8120/FX-6100

    I will suggest you to get the AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor FD8120FRGUBOX .It comes with the following features:
    • Unlocked AMD FX 8-Core Processor
    • AMD Turbo CORE Technology
    • New Instruction Capabilities – AVX, FMA4 and XOP, AES
    • AMD HyperTransport Technology
    • Integrated DRAM Controller with AMD Memory Optimizer Technology
    • AMD Virtualization (AMD-V) Technology with IOMMU

Similar Threads

  1. AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer performance for Gaming only
    By Oye! Champion in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 20-05-2012, 12:09 PM
  2. Power management of AMD FX-8120 Bulldozer
    By Cheeru in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 13-04-2012, 03:28 PM
  3. How to unlock AMD Bulldozer FX-6100?
    By CheeCha in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 24-03-2012, 08:14 PM
  4. VMware ESXi 5 does not work with AMD FX-8120 Bulldozer CPU
    By tHeDa! in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23-03-2012, 12:08 PM
  5. AMD FX-8120 Bulldozer underclock itself when idling
    By #4 in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-03-2012, 03:39 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,716,478,093.19118 seconds with 17 queries