I want the lowest idle power consuming option. I don't think there's something extra demanding than H264 interlaced, but the machine should support and control the file serving at disk bottlenecked power as well - it must not be partial by CPU lack of control.
that’s why I don't now go ahead and purchase the cheaper than BTW is because I am not certain it can control Gbit Ethernet and numerous disks include standard spindle ones at maximum speed.
The second thing I am bearing in mind are the reported consumptions of the two a great deal additional CPU powerful solutions. Theoretically the differentiation at idle is less than 20W. guys please share your opinions. Thanks.
Bookmarks