Information about Intel Ivy Bridge and Panther Point

[SawalGuru]

Hello guys some day before I read something about Intel’s Ivy Bridge, Maho Bay and Panther Point. And here are my views. The latter one will lastly obtain USB 3.0 hold up. Ivy Bridge processors are effortlessly compatible through existing LGA1155 platforms, and “Cougar Point” P67, H67, H61, Z68, chipsets, although it will come with its own 7-series chipset. For the majority part, Ivy Bridge is indistinguishable to Sandy Bridge, being an optical shrink as of obtainable 32 nm to 22 nm. It will characteristic a fresh dual-channel DDR3 memory controller in the company of authorized support for DRAM speeds of equal to DDR3-1600 MHz There’s the common PCI-Express 2.0 x 16 hubs that are able to drive up to two distinct graphics cards through electrical x8 connections. Please share your views with us thank you.

[Alexisus]

It appears persons don't observe the handwriting resting on the wall through 1155. Confident the dual vs. quad channel ram isn't a huge deal. However if you pay money for a motherboard 1155, recognize that there are not any plans intended for anything other than four cores. If I had an X58, no way I'm going to buy an 1155. The making of 2011 without the IGP will be foolish to refuse to evacuate a system that remains viable for a much longer time than the 1155. High speed of 22 nm octocores IB will be the future perhaps platuea the PC for a long time. If you are the type that changes the base plates each year after a 1155 might have some meaning, but if you want a computer that can stay for years will have to wait for socket 2011, is just as clear as a bell when you look at the situation.

[Nutty]

They have not "gone backwards" as such, the most important platforms still contain dual channel ram as they have completed for years. The platform is going high-end triple channel for four channels. What has changed is that for some reason, Intel is launching the "mainstream" version of new architectures in the first place. This leaves the high-end buyers with a dilemma or the upper end of the old architecture or the mainstream of the new architecture to be a clear winner in all tests.

[Terrextre]

The obsession is for the reason that of Intel’s push towards advanced integration what make use of to be characteristics of the chipset have at the moment be converted into characteristics of the processor. Through LGA775 the amount of ram channels and fast* PCIe lanes beside through the presence or nonappearance of integrated graphics was somewhat determined with the Northbridge. You possibly will combine a low end CPU among a high end Northbridge or a high end CPU in the company of a low end Northbridge.

[AmdUser]

Through LGA1366 memory controller on the processor moved so that their characteristics are determined by the processor socket not the chipset. Technically could have made multiple centers of E / S of a single socket LGA1366 with different number of PCIe lanes but never actually did in practice the number of PCIe lanes also set faster. The platform does not provide for integrated graphics at all. With the later platforms (LGA1156, LGA1155 and LGA2011) also moved the fast * PCIe and integrated graphics (if any) on the CPU.

[Logan.M]

I have the same opinion with you on this. It presently doesn't make any intelligence. Who would place down huge cash for SB-E octocores assemble on 32nm tech within Q4 2011 when they possibly will get mainstream priced octocores assemble on 22nm tech within Q1 2012? Parenthetically, has somebody observe anything official looking that SB-E will have octocores in any way? It appears like the last couple of 'leaded slides' or no matter what I've seen contain only mentioned 6-core processors.