Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    52

    Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

    I just feel unwell by asking this but….. I cannot appear to obtain precedent 3.0GHz SMP_FAH stable in Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Pro. I am able to boot into Windows 7 at 3.4 GHz but it is not steady. BSOD Blue Screen of Death in short orders Boots at 3.3 GHz, but cannot hold with most recent version WinSMP FAH running. Core temperatures are less than 60 degree C in summer 100 percent FAH load at 4 GHz. This is at 15 degree Centigrade ambient with extremely fine air cooling.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,070

    Re: Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

    You will require obtaining your BUS speed up to 380 MHz to hit that, and you are going to require additional voltage. May you require additional reference voltage as well! That is 1000 MHz and .29V extra on the core than you are doing at present. That just shows constancy sufficient to complete a benchmark, but it provides you an idea of what is possible.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,010

    Re: Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

    I also want to add something over her. I don't encompass a BIOS template for the Commando, but I do contain a PIC of the Overclocking menu that you can make use of to place all of your present settings at 3.0 GHz. as well make use of Real Temp-- Settings page to discover the VID of your quad.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    979

    Re: Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

    I am not being familiar too much with the Asus Commando, and cannot read the CPU-Z shots from my tiny BlackBerry screen. I do know that I was simply able to get my Q6600 G0 Rev-B to 3.3 on consequent boot with the Gigabyte P45 board in my SIG. It was simply just a stuff of going into BIOS, and situating Vcore to manual, FSB to 500, and Multi to x8. While I obtain a chance, I will inflame my RIG so I can find a superior look at your SS's, and observe what I can do to assist you out.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    976

    Re: Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

    I utilized to contain a 1.35v VID Q6600 and I found it BOINC steady at 3.7, but I required around 1.65v below load to do it IIRC. My 1.35 VID Q6600 I still have will do 3.7 BOINC steady at right at 1.5v Vcore below load. It seems like your board has awful VDROP or VDROOP, so you will have to recompense for that while below load. Since you are running F@H which will maintain the whole thing loaded down pretty much, you don't actually necessitate worrying about high Vcore while inactive.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,260

    Re: Require 3.4GHz FAH stable on Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0

    Setup 377 x 9 to 3.5 GHz and attempt to place V core to 1.53v is too much but while you obtain steady, attempt to place more to VSB term voltage and NB and SB and lesser your V core. Memory voltage put to 1.9 V not to 2.2 V because you do not have XMP profile on RAM. If you contain on BIOS Load line calibration, situate to enabled, and increase spectrum set to disabled

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-03-2012, 11:34 AM
  2. Intel Core Quad Q6600 at 4GHz overclock
    By Zia 7 in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-02-2011, 07:34 PM
  3. How to keep Core i7 930 stable @ 4.4Ghz
    By Wajidali in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-12-2010, 11:40 PM
  4. Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Core 2 Duo E8500
    By Maecellus in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-07-2009, 12:09 PM
  5. Intel Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) vs. Core 2 Duo E8400 (3.0 GHz)
    By Sanith in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 10:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,715,813,026.46809 seconds with 17 queries