MacBook Pro Unibody - Graphics

[Hakon]

Hello everyone,

This is a week I received my new MBP 2.53. I am very happy, no defects and I'm the new trackpad which I think is the best innovation of this mac.

By against I wonder what the 9600M graphics card 512? in fact I only played WoW is not a game to the greedy card.

Starting to play WoW on my new MBP I kept the standard settings (9400) and last night I remember the need to manually activate the 9600M So I make the change - log out - etc ... and there is virtually no difference in fluidity in the game but in fact there and I'm disappointed after 5 minutes and no longer stop!

Since I prefer enjoying playing music and sound effects I came back to setting standard for graphics Pity to have such a good CG whether to put headphone

Crysis remains the worst. It breaks down very very hard. Heuresement loudspeakers of mac very well come to exceed the noise ..??

[Ryder]

9600 is a map for real applications greedy ... that to get a MBP now, I'm never happened in 9600, the 9400 is enough for me well done.

[Fabian]

Personal WoW on the difference between the 9400 and 9600 I sense.
All of a fluid substance and on the 9600, you must lower the quality to get the fluidity with 9400. See if you are well 1440x900 with all graphics settings to the fullest.

For me, it has to change activity souls card whenever I wanted to play (especially as I do several sessions of WoW per day) so I opted for the less good graphics with the 9400.To play effectively, I use Windows.

[deoWo]

I too did that of course my wow 2.53, 9600 in action, we feel the difference, I advise you to use the 9600 with the standard graphics settings I use for booster belkin play, which helps to ventilate the lower part of the book, my ventilos run between 4000 and 5000 rpm, which is acceptable to play with the 9400 is not enough fluid, and God knows that wow is a game appreciate, even though the graphics are outdated, wow remain few years GAMBLING MacBook, and it is my opinion and it is debatable. As against it would be interesting to know the graphics settings of other users wow on unibody.

[T.J.]

The 2.8GHz cores run 11% faster than the 2.53GHz cores. In a graphics intensive benchmark with high resolution and high quality effects, the difference should be less than 11% since the GPUs are clocked the same and cranking at 95%. That's what we see above where the advantage varies from 1% to 9% for the 9600M GT mode.