|
| ||||||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Difference between FIXBOOT and BOOTCFG in Recovery Console?
|
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
I think that when you connect your "newer" SATA HDD to the motherboard's SATA 0 connector, either your second HDD is disconnected from the system or if it's still connected to another SATA (or IDE) connector your BIOS boot priority order indicates a *first* boot to the "newer" SATA HDD (as philo has mentioned). This is so, right? Therefore to simplify this issue, you can try to fresh install the Windows XP operating system onto your newer Sata hard drive. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Difference between FIXBOOT and BOOTCFG in Recovery Console?" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there a difference between PC and console | Itachi Uchiha | Video Games | 6 | 17-03-2011 10:15 PM |
| What is the proper order to run the Fixboot, Fixmbr, and BOOTCFG/rebuild commands? | Abenaki | Operating Systems | 6 | 12-05-2010 09:16 AM |
| HP Recovery console | Krish07 | Operating Systems | 3 | 09-09-2009 03:30 PM |
| chkdsk without recovery console | Hemadri | Windows XP Support | 4 | 11-04-2008 06:56 PM |
| Boot.Ini and recovery Console | Susan Bradley | Windows XP Support | 8 | 02-03-2008 08:49 AM |