I want to use windows 7 with haali media splitter

[Austin Power]

Sponsored Links

I recently started utilizing Windows 7 x64, on the whole first impression is congratulations! Right commencing from the acquire go the codec hold up is attractive the entire encompassing. At least of the ones I utilize. It recognized and played each file in my media documentation flawlessly. mkv, mp4, m2ts, avi, xvid/divx. Several file I have comprised and attempted to mux through tsMuxer into m2ts the resulting file stutters dreadfully in playback. The haali icon pops up in the system tray, if I put out of action/uninstall haali it tranquil stutters. I do not encompass several tribulations through previously completed files under vista. They are the entire flawless. The entire the similar if anyone has several insight, or suggestions for trouble shooting I would much appreciate it.

[sergioKomic]

Do you actually necessitate CoreAVC and the Haali Media Splitter. I am doing several research and it come into view as though Windows 7 has built-in sustain or maintain for them and they in addition utilize the newer Media Foundation as an alternative of DirectShow. In addition, Media Foundation sustains or maintains DXVA v2.0 so would not the built-in H.264 Media Foundation codec have comprised hardware hastening. I am in addition not certain why you would necessitate the Haali Media Splitter in view of the fact that I thought there was a built-in MKV splitter. The Windows 7 does not have an .mkv splitter, consequently Haali Media Splitter is tranquil needed. The built-in decoder is an extremely well DXVA decoder other than not for decoding in software mode.

[!const]

The Windows 7 does not have comprised a built-in MKV splitter and Haali splitter is recognized to be extremely buggy on Windows 7, crashing regarding 1,450 times a day according to Microsoft. You do not actually necessitate CoreAVC in view of the fact that the MS Win7 decoder be able to utilize DXVA decoding for far lower CPU usage than several CPU merely software decoder. The catch is, MS Windows 7 decoder is known to be buggy, even in the RTM release. Doom9 discussion has plenty of dreadfulness stories regarding it. MPC-HC's DXVA decoder is far additional dependable, other than does not support VC-1 interlaced files, merely progressive.

[Gunilla]

I would generating a dedicated HTPC utilizing Windows 7 and desire to utilize Media Center so MPC-HC is actually out of the query. You mention with the intention of the built-in H.264 is much lower CPU procedure than several additional software decoder. Does with the intention of it does not have hardware acceleration similar to CoreAVC. In addition, how well is the innovative DivX beta MKV splitter. It’s completed for Media Foundation as an alternative of DirectShow. You be able to utilize the stand unaccompanied MPC-HC Codecs within Windows 7 Media Center. I have encompassed and been utilizing it in view of the fact that the early developer preview release of Windows 7 and it has worked flawlessly.

[CodGuru]

I have comprised not experienced this at the entire. I dropped Haali splitter on and not anything else, and have comprised nothing other than a smooth experience. I recommend endeavoring the simplest configuration and merely revolutionize things to address tribulations. Read into with the intention of bug report and you determine to observe what the issue is and it is not Haali's splitter. The DXVA determine to _ALWAYS_ have comprised lower CPU usage. Is with the intention of not superior. Not actually as those lower cycles come at a cost of stream treatment color correction, hue, brightness, cropping etc. Then apparently, you would superior fix issues with not being capable to utilize CUDA for convinced streams or whatever is essentially the predicament smittyline is experiencing.

[Asis]

I am just wondering in view of the fact that I observe your name in excess of at the CoreAVC discussion I have comprised and purchased CoreAVC a small number of months ago and encompass been thrilled. I am merely endeavoring to understand the differences at present with the intention of Windows 7 include certain additional decoders. What's the big dissimilarity then connecting CoreAVC and Microsoft's decoder. It sounds approximating you are saying with the intention of CoreAVC does not transform the stream so it's essentially "pixel perfect" when it acquire to the television other than Microsoft's decoder is performing color improvement and additional things which are typically bad when you desire an accurate reproduction of the movie.