Windows 7 64 bit - critical error event ID 41 kernel power

[Marjorie]

A question is often heard now, why the OS (especially Windows) do not they still mostly 64 bit? A corollary to this question, why Windows 7 will he go out in 32-bit (like Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6)? Several reasons explain the relatively slow adoption of these versions. Sum up. I have an critical error event ID 41 kernel power on windows 7. Please help.

[Eric B]

You need to remember that a portion of this type has already taken place on our PC: 16 to 32 bits. In 1985, Intel announces the 80386, first 32-bit x86 processor, which was prompted by the 80286 and 8086 (the 186 has been rarely used in PCs), two 16-bit CPU. Were the first Windows 16-bit and Windows 3.11 could even use 32-bit code with certain extensions (like the level editor Warcraft II), it was coded in 16 bits. Windows 95 was the first Windows to require a 32-bit processor but it still contained a lot of 16-bit code. In practice, the public first Windows that does not contain 16-bit code was Windows XP (or NT 4.0 or Windows 2000 are considered public OS).

[Glenny]

The 64-bit x86 processors is a relatively new technology: the first processor compatible date was April 2003 and for the professional market (Opteron) and the massive 64-bit processors in the general public only since mid-2006 (no offense to fans of AMD, the Core 2 Duo Intel has actually launched the 64-bit). For 64-bit OS, the arrival of Windows 64-bit version of April 2005, with a Windows XP designed primarily for professionals (based on code from the 2003 server). It was not until Windows Vista for a true Windows 64-bit general public, four years after the first compatible processor, which is already fast.

[JonathanD]

If Windows 7 is different, it's also because Microsoft has changed since the departure of Bill Gates. Thus, the technical director, a pioneer in collaborative work (he started the development of Lotus Notes and created Groove Networks, a company specializing in collaborative software) was able to straighten the course taken by Vista. A long process conducted with the chief architect of the system, Steven Sinofsky. Having redesigned the user interface of Office 2007 suite, the latter reiterated his exploits with Windows 7.

[Macarenas]

In fact, even if Windows 7 will accelerate the shift to 64-bit, 32-bit code may remain for a very long time the norm for programs and it is not even entirely sure that the successor to Windows 7 will be available only 64 bits. Note that this analysis is limited to Windows, which is a system far more dependent on the market that Mac OS X and Linux. For Mac OS X Snow Leopard OS will be the first 64 bits of the firm (with a 32-bit for the Core Duo), but his successor will be a priori totally 64 bits, so that Linux was the first x86-compatible 64-bit OS and that the major distributions are all 64-bit for a while (which arises in practice fewer problems than Windows).

[addie]

I have exactly the same problem as you. I said that my problem is the same on Windows, but there with official drivers. The BIOS setup and it would cause? No, I flashed my BIOS and the result is the same (the bios configuration is optimal and it is not a problem with the AHCI). RAM then either: Memtest 86 does not detect any error.