Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Flash player vs flash Plugin

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    65

    Flash player vs flash Plugin

    Recently purchased a new laptop installed with windows 7. As i was browsing through the control panels add/remove programs i found some programs which i think that i don't use including the Flash player and Flash Plug-in as far as i know these programs are used for similar programs i clearly do not know why these programs are used for anybody any ideas.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,755

    Re: Flash player vs flash Plugin

    Both are extremely complementary. Very good if there is more need for Flash video. But for everything else, HTML5 is light years or even Flash Sylverlight. This is not because we have a html code a bit rich that one must be content and delete the most sophisticated technologies. So i don't find any difference between these two applications.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    66

    Re: Flash player vs flash Plugin

    I too have to similar kind of doubt and also i don't agree with Sam.D at all since if both these application have been a single application then why these tow applications are recognized by two name more over why they appear as two distinct application in the add/remove program utility in the control panel.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,642

    Re: Flash player vs flash Plugin

    As far as i know the flash player and the flash plugin are associated to the browser they are installed on the browser and also these two applications are utilized by the browser for these tasks and hence i would advice you to keep the application installed on your system and not to remove the apps.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,316

    Re: Flash player vs flash Plugin

    Flash SWF is played by a plugin. Silverlight XAP is interpreted by the plugin. The difference at the base, y'en has not done. To swallow people that HTML5 will save the world is a bit funny. Finally if there's still a bit of a difference is that Flash and Silverlight have a foot in the OS, and can make things much further work that will require a lot of side HTML5 to be reproduced or be dependent browser. The interaction with the gear we speak.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,345

    Re: Flash player vs flash Plugin

    The Flash player and flash plugins are some of the best application which are now a days installed automatically on the browser the basic difference of both these application is that the Flash player activeX is required by the Internet Explorer and the Flash player plugin is installed on the Firefox automatically.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,139

    Re: Flash player vs flash Plugin

    Each technology is different, and even in the best of worlds we can not satisfy all, so I think a site before being put in place must do a study on the targeted population. I think the generic sites like news sites should be based on standard HTML, while sites selling digital service, unless you want advocated NO-DRM must be based on technology called "closed" for a minimum of controls on their data.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18-03-2012, 06:07 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-12-2011, 01:24 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-11-2010, 05:23 PM
  4. Flash Player Plugin Ubuntu 9.1
    By Martien in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 13-01-2010, 10:37 PM
  5. Adobe Flash Player plugin freezing
    By CrazeD in forum Windows Software
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-12-2009, 09:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,713,568,949.91452 seconds with 17 queries