Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Unable to perform Disc-at-once

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    88

    Unable to perform Disc-at-once

    I have Windows XP running on my TOSHIBA Satellite A100 Laptop. Yesterday I tried to burn a DVD but suddenly got an error "unable to perform the disc at once".

    So I tried Nero 7, Nero 8, Nero 9 again and again but the same error.

    Please help me with this!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    979

    Re: Unable to perform Disc-at-once

    How old is the DVD burner and have you updated the firmware in it? It seems that you may have an incompatibility with the media you are using and a firmware update should solve that

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,945

    Re: Unable to perform Disc-at-once

    Apparently, Nero has a setting under the File/Options… Expert Features tab called “Enable DVD Overburning.” Set this value to its maximum value (4600 MB).

    From what I’ve been reading, apparently some DVD-R drives have trouble just recording the standard 4.7 Gb on a DVD-R. So, even though 4600 MB on a DVD-R isn’t technically “overburning,” just having Nero label the action as overburning alleviates the problem.

Similar Threads

  1. After softmodding Wii disc drive unable to read disc
    By PaK PoK in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17-01-2012, 10:37 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16-09-2011, 10:40 PM
  3. Unable to perform stunt in Infamous 2
    By DanielaA in forum Video Games
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-07-2011, 11:10 PM
  4. Unable to perform command error MS Access
    By Common in forum Windows Software
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27-03-2010, 05:15 AM
  5. Unable to perform end track
    By Cavan in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-03-2009, 10:31 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,171,136.57555 seconds with 17 queries