|
| |||||||||
| Tags: l2tp, martixx333, pptp, vpn |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| VPN - PPTP vs L2TP
Can I get some opinion on PPTP vs L2TP VPN on Server 2003 for a small business? I originally thought L2TP with a pre-shared key would be best, but then I found this: "PPTP using MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication is more secure than L2TP with pre-shared key authentication". Any thoughts appreciated. Russell. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: VPN - PPTP vs L2TP
I beleive L2TP is more secure. Quoted from Microsoft: · PPTP connections require only user-level authentication through a PPP-based authentication protocol. L2TP/IPSec connections require the same user-level authentication and, in addition, computer-level authentication using computer certificates. Also check this search result. Which one is better, L2TP or PPTPA: PPTP is comparatively less secure than L2TP because L2TP does per packet authentication and integrity check using IPSec. But PPTP is easy to deploy. ... www.chicagotech.net/Q&A/vpn45.htm -- Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com "Russella" <russella@tryware.com.au> wrote in message news:ePDCX6YhJHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Can I get some opinion on PPTP vs L2TP VPN on Server 2003 for a small > business? > > I originally thought L2TP with a pre-shared key would be best, but then I > found this: > > "PPTP using MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication is more secure than L2TP > with pre-shared key authentication". > > Any thoughts appreciated. > Russell. > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| RE: VPN - PPTP vs L2TP
Hi Russella, L2TP has several advantages over PPTP, as you can see here: http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/VPN-Options.html -- Have a nice day! Masterplan - MCSE,MCITP-EA http://winmasterplan.blogspot.com "Russella" wrote: > Can I get some opinion on PPTP vs L2TP VPN on Server 2003 for a small > business? > > I originally thought L2TP with a pre-shared key would be best, but then I > found this: > > "PPTP using MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication is more secure than L2TP > with pre-shared key authentication". > > Any thoughts appreciated. > Russell. > > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: VPN - PPTP vs L2TP
I think what you read is wrong. Both use MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication. L2TP uses IPSec based encryption on top of that. -- Phillip Windell www.wandtv.com The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats. ----------------------------------------------------- "Russella" <russella@tryware.com.au> wrote in message news:ePDCX6YhJHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Can I get some opinion on PPTP vs L2TP VPN on Server 2003 for a small > business? > > I originally thought L2TP with a pre-shared key would be best, but then I > found this: > > "PPTP using MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication is more secure than L2TP > with pre-shared key authentication". > > Any thoughts appreciated. > Russell. > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: VPN - PPTP vs L2TP
Agree. -- Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com "Phillip Windell" <philwindell@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23GXM8MjhJHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >I think what you read is wrong. > > Both use MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication. > > L2TP uses IPSec based encryption on top of that. > > -- > Phillip Windell > www.wandtv.com > > The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or > Microsoft, > or anyone else associated with me, including my cats. > ----------------------------------------------------- > > > "Russella" <russella@tryware.com.au> wrote in message > news:ePDCX6YhJHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Can I get some opinion on PPTP vs L2TP VPN on Server 2003 for a small >> business? >> >> I originally thought L2TP with a pre-shared key would be best, but then I >> found this: >> >> "PPTP using MS-CHAPv2 or EAP-TLS authentication is more secure than L2TP >> with pre-shared key authentication". >> >> Any thoughts appreciated. >> Russell. >> > > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: VPN - PPTP vs L2TP
"Robert L. (MS-MVP)" <findemail@chicagotech.net> wrote in message news:%23W1ys2lhJHA.996@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Agree. Thanks Bob! -- Phillip Windell www.wandtv.com The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats. ----------------------------------------------------- |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "VPN - PPTP vs L2TP" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Error 789 - L2TP / IPSec | netsec1 | Windows Vista Network | 1 | 16-05-2011 01:12 AM |
| L2TP/IPSec VPN Configuration | Al | Small Business Server | 12 | 09-02-2008 12:51 AM |
| L2TP certificate for VPN connection | Peter Herijgers | Windows Server Help | 0 | 05-02-2008 06:27 PM |
| L2TP IPsec VPN Error 678? | Bruce J | Windows Server Help | 1 | 10-01-2008 09:56 PM |
| L2TP VPN with single NIC on server | Ketil | Windows Server Help | 1 | 28-06-2007 09:31 PM |