|
| |||||||||
| Tags: manager, memory, physical, total, value |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
This is with Vista SP1 installed. I added 2GB RAM making the total installed RAM size to be 4GB. My problem is that although BIOS recognize the RAM size to be 4GB and the Properties/System shows also 4GB, but both of the System Information/System Tools and Performance/Task Manager show 2GB. How can I check to see if 4GB is being made available for the system to utilize? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| RE: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
32 bit or 64 bit vista? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
It is 32 bit Vista. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
4GB is *not* available to your system. You have a 4GB address space, but some of that must be used to access BIOS, video RAM, etc. What's left over is used to access RAM. See http://members.cox.net/slatteryt/RAM.html That said, I'd expect you to see more than 2GB. Do you have multiple fancy video cards, or something else that might include lots of onboard RAM? -- Tim Slattery MS MVP(Shell/User) |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
It sounds like the RAM isn't being detected. What does the BIOS show? Either way, the maximum amount of RAM you will be able to access (without enabling PAE) is 3.2GB. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Enabling PAE does not help in 32bit Windows clients, but it does Servers (Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Editions and later). See the Windows Memory Limits table for details. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Two points: 1. PAE doesn't help on Windows client operating systems, just on servers. 2. The maximum accessible amount is not precisely 3.2GB, but varies from as little as 2 to 2.5 (in rare cases) to as much as 3.5GB, depending on your hardware configuration. Here's my standard post on this subject: All 32-bit versions of Windows (not just XP) have a 4GB address space. That's the theoretical upper limit beyond which you can not go. But you can't use the entire 4GB of address space. Even though you have a 4GB address space, you can only use *around* 3.1GB of RAM. That's because some of that space is used by hardware and is not available to the operating system and applications. The amount you can use varies, depending on what hardware you have installed, but can range from as little as 2GB to as much as 3.5GB. It's usually around 3.1GB. Note that the hardware is using the address *space*, not the actual RAM itself. The rest of the RAM goes unused because there is no address space to map it too. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
There is nothing in Windows itself that limits 32bit Windows from using 4GB of memory. What limits Windows on modern hardware is the BIOS reserving memory space for devices. It is called memory-mapped IO and provides a very rapid but unprotected way of writing data to video cards, etc. The BIOS reserves the memory space to protect it from the user programs from also writing there. The whole idea is to get the fastest performace possible out of things like video cards because that is what users want. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Does the above mean as follows? BIOS and System|Properties show correct size of installed RAM while System Tools|System Information and Task Manager|Performance show the maximum usable part of the installed RAM. The maximum usable part could be as low as 2GB. Therefor,if 4GB is installed and Task Manager|Performance indicates that the Total Physical Memory is 2GB, then half of the installed RAM is waisted. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Correct. Your BIOS should tell you how much is detected, your OS how much is available. (In simple terms) >> 1. PAE doesn't help on Windows client operating systems, just on >> servers. Fair enough. I just did a quick google to check Windows compatibility with PAE. I use Unix. >> 2. The maximum accessible amount is not precisely 3.2GB Forgive my absence of a tilde (~)... |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
It's a very big tilde. My XP systems showed anything from 2.2GB to 3.5GB before all our computers were promoted to Vista. I use VPC extensively so I just tried an experiment to see how close I could get to using all the memory in a computer in Windows itself. In VPC I tried maximizing the memory allocation for an XP Pro vm in its vm Settings. I got as high as 3.62GB to show on system properties with an allocation of 3.712GB memory, which is the max VPC allows for a guest, on my Vista Ultimate x64 host. 3.712GB happens to be the max permitted by VPC on any host. VPC emulates very old hardware so the reservation of relatively little memory by the guest's BIOS makes a lot of sense. My point is that the hardware on a computer has everything to do with how much memory is available to user programs when 4GB of ram is installed. btw, if VPC had allowed me to allocate a full 4GB for the guest I would still have only gotten 3.62GB to show on system properties. It is the addresses that are being reserved. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Correction: The last paragraph is not accurate. I made some inquiries with the virtualization team at MS and I would have seen something closer to but still under 4GB if VPC supported allocating a full 4GB. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Thanks for your clarification. I thought about removing the 2GB stick for use somewhere else, but that makes the memory access be single channel(two sticks are being used as dual channel operation) so decided to leave it in. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:37:04 -0400, churin <churin@new.postalias> wrote: Yes, that's correct. But bear in mind that a usable amount as low as 2GB is very rare. A more typical amount is around 3.1-3.2GB. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?
Ken, I should think that hitting 2GB on the nose with 4GB installed calls for investigation of the BIOS settings and then testing the hardware. It just does not sound right to me. The lowest I have ever seen on my own hardware with 4GB installed is 2.2GB. What do you think? |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value?" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Computer using all Physical Memory on task manager | Daksha90 | Operating Systems | 4 | 22-06-2011 12:48 PM |
| Installed vs total physical memory | LisaLisa | Windows Software | 2 | 25-09-2009 09:55 AM |
| Symantec update process shows wmiprvse.exe in task manager | jean-paul martell | Operating Systems | 4 | 15-06-2009 12:35 PM |
| Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory | Fitz | Vista Help | 4 | 02-04-2009 09:49 AM |
| Installed Physical Memory/Total Physical Memory | Roy69z | Vista Setup and Install | 1 | 06-06-2008 03:52 AM |