Hi.
Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it work?
Dale
Hi.
Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it work?
Dale
That is a question you should direct to Symantec.
--
Cari (MS-MVP)
Windows Technologies - Printing & Imaging
http://www.coribright.com/windows
"Bikini Browser" <bikini.browser@Stop-Spam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23zP7wEJVHHA.1432@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hi.
>
> Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it
> work?
>
> Dale
>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:48:05 -0400, "Bikini Browser"
<bikini.browser@Stop-Spam.gmail.com> spake thusly:
>Hi.
>
>Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it work?
>
No, but please let us know what the results of your test is. :-)
--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.
Even if Symantec says it works, I still want feedback from real world users.
So please excuse me.
Dale
"Cari (MS-MVP)" <NewsGroups@coribright.com> wrote in message
news:u7QNdrJVHHA.972@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> That is a question you should direct to Symantec.
> --
> Cari (MS-MVP)
> Windows Technologies - Printing & Imaging
> http://www.coribright.com/windows
>
> "Bikini Browser" <bikini.browser@Stop-Spam.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23zP7wEJVHHA.1432@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Hi.
>>
>> Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it
>> work?
>>
>> Dale
>>
>
It's flaky under XP, so I would not hold my breath.
Bikini Browser wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it work?
>
> Dale
>
>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:21:58 -0500, Barry Watzman
<WatzmanNOSPAM@neo.rr.com> spake thusly:
>
>Bikini Browser wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it work?
>>
>> Dale
>>
>>
>
>It's flaky under XP, so I would not hold my breath.
>
Normal for all Symantec Crapware products.
--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.
I agree. The thing could barely be made to work with Windows XP. I wouldn't
hold much hope for Vista.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bikini Browser" <bikini.browser@Stop-Spam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OzND0AKVHHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Even if Symantec says it works, I still want feedback from real world
> users. So please excuse me.
>
> Dale
>
>
>
> "Cari (MS-MVP)" <NewsGroups@coribright.com> wrote in message
> news:u7QNdrJVHHA.972@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> That is a question you should direct to Symantec.
>> --
>> Cari (MS-MVP)
>> Windows Technologies - Printing & Imaging
>> http://www.coribright.com/windows
>>
>> "Bikini Browser" <bikini.browser@Stop-Spam.gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23zP7wEJVHHA.1432@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Has anyone tested Symantec Winfax Pro Version 10.3 on Vista? Does it
>>> work?
>>>
>>> Dale
>>>
>>
>
>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:12:52 GMT, Scott
<geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote:
>Normal for all Symantec Crapware products.
Lets be fair. Symantec buy good products/market leaders and turn them
into abandonware! I don't know why they bother.
Cheers,
Guy
** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:30:53 +0000, Dr Teeth
<no_email_here_please@tardis.com> spake thusly:
>On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:12:52 GMT, Scott
><geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote:
>
>>Normal for all Symantec Crapware products.
>
>Lets be fair. Symantec buy good products/market leaders and turn them
>into abandonware! I don't know why they bother.
I've wondered that myself.
Once upon a time there was....
Peter Norton Computing (Norton Utilities, Norton AntiVirus)
Central Point Software (PC Tools)
Quarterdeck (CleanSweep)
Delrina (WinFax)
Binary Research (Ghost)
DataStorm (Procomm Plus)
Dynamic Microprocessor Associates. (PCAnywhere)
Veritas (Backup Exec)
(The Original) SecurityFocus.com
P:owerQuest. (PartitionMagic, DriveMagic)
Sygate Technologies Sygate Firewall (including a FREE consumer
version, that vanished along with the Sygate name.).......
Just to name a few....
Come to think of it, WTF HAS Symantec given us from day one?
--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:36:58 GMT, Scott
<geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote:
>Once upon a time there was....
Wow, I forgot some of those. Thanks for the trip down memory lane <g>
and shame on you Symantec.
Cheers,
Guy
** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:36:58 GMT, Scott
<geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote:
>Delrina (WinFax)
Remember the wacky screensaver that came with this, something and
Bill.
--
Nigel M
Symantec has killed more products than Cisco! And that's tough to do!
"Scott" wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:30:53 +0000, Dr Teeth
> <no_email_here_please@tardis.com> spake thusly:
>
> >On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:12:52 GMT, Scott
> ><geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote:
> >
> >>Normal for all Symantec Crapware products.
> >
> >Lets be fair. Symantec buy good products/market leaders and turn them
> >into abandonware! I don't know why they bother.
>
> I've wondered that myself.
>
> Once upon a time there was....
>
> Peter Norton Computing (Norton Utilities, Norton AntiVirus)
> Central Point Software (PC Tools)
> Quarterdeck (CleanSweep)
> Delrina (WinFax)
> Binary Research (Ghost)
> DataStorm (Procomm Plus)
> Dynamic Microprocessor Associates. (PCAnywhere)
> Veritas (Backup Exec)
> (The Original) SecurityFocus.com
> P:owerQuest. (PartitionMagic, DriveMagic)
> Sygate Technologies Sygate Firewall (including a FREE consumer
> version, that vanished along with the Sygate name.).......
> Just to name a few....
>
> Come to think of it, WTF HAS Symantec given us from day one?
>
> --
> Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
> be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.
>
On Fri, 11 May 2007 22:39:01 -0700, Lee - Nortel
<LeeNortel@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Symantec has killed more products than Cisco! And that's tough to do!
>
Corel?
>"Scott" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:30:53 +0000, Dr Teeth
>> <no_email_here_please@tardis.com> spake thusly:
>>
>> >On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:12:52 GMT, Scott
>> ><geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Normal for all Symantec Crapware products.
>> >
>> >Lets be fair. Symantec buy good products/market leaders and turn them
>> >into abandonware! I don't know why they bother.
>>
>> I've wondered that myself.
>>
>> Once upon a time there was....
>>
>> Peter Norton Computing (Norton Utilities, Norton AntiVirus)
>> Central Point Software (PC Tools)
>> Quarterdeck (CleanSweep)
>> Delrina (WinFax)
>> Binary Research (Ghost)
>> DataStorm (Procomm Plus)
>> Dynamic Microprocessor Associates. (PCAnywhere)
>> Veritas (Backup Exec)
>> (The Original) SecurityFocus.com
>> P:owerQuest. (PartitionMagic, DriveMagic)
>> Sygate Technologies Sygate Firewall (including a FREE consumer
>> version, that vanished along with the Sygate name.).......
>> Just to name a few....
>>
>> Come to think of it, WTF HAS Symantec given us from day one?
>>
>> --
>> Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
>>
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
>> be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.
>>
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks