How to defeat or win against CPU in Football Manager 2012

[MakNti]

Sponsored Links

My team (Palermo), to play the three teams with the ball at least 55% and the three parties at least 19 shots on goal, an average of 9 in white. The three teams had a shooting accuracy of 100% in terms of shots into goals. In other words, Atlanta had a shot on target, and scored that goal. The other two teams had two shots on target and scored with the shooting. Two of the three games were played at home. Obviously, once again, this is the trap of the game and the motivating factor that kills the quality of play and the person who stressed that, although the creation of the game should be fired. I have an excellent Italian striker Roberto Lombardi. Impressive attributes plane. In the 10 games he has played just three goals. Is performed pathetically wrong, and on average is 6.70, and 5.8 in the last three games. I am sick and tired of telling this man to "prove something". So, after being disgusted by the last three games, I reloaded to try something else. And yes, it's cheating, but I'm playing a game right here. If the CPU is to cheat, then I can do trap. or those of you who feel "offended" by this, no BS saying he never reloads, because I believe that as much as I think Lady Gaga is a human being. It is not. Anyway, before loading the game I thought the things I could change my past thinking and strategies of training of many years of playing this game. I also thought, if I'm getting so upset, why am I still playing this game? My answer was: "I love building teams." It's true. I love to team up with the transfers, transfers, loans and what you have. It's great fun. It's more fun than watching your team play. So I thought, if you can not beat the CPU forms of cheating, the same CPU could match against the CPU? Therefore, this is proof that the CPU cheats and the factor of motivation is the key to the CPU to cheat. This is fun! I'm making and still feel proud because I am totally rebuilt Palermo and built a winner. And i eliminate irritation forcing the CPU to lose for stupid reasons, unrealistic.

[Enos]

You basically proved nothing, except that if it could infect play the same game twice in real life, the results would be exactly the same in every game. All we have shown is possible that the assistant manager understands the game better than you ... Maybe you're a bad manager, managing his team wrong?

[mbangali]

What I notice is my message before hitting the road too many times and only takes poor shots effortlessly. I got tired of reading "did well, so until the end!" at the bottom of the screen. Giuseppe Rossi had scored 18-21 goals in Genoa. Neymar scoring 10, but a lot of help. And my team won the Series A Genoa, lost at the end of ECC for Man U, and was the highest scoring team in Series A. I use exactly the same tactics. But even with Genoa and Juventus my other saved game, I had problems with small teams. I have three strikers up front. Hulk-Lombardi-Di Pasquale. The three games I've seen the most bizarre plays. This type Subasic or whatever the name of GK was an average at best attributes. Play as Buffon and Cech. Just a score in the. Lombardi kicked the ball badly in the chest of the keeper, or shot wide of the post, or hitting the wood. I've seen the doormen to the Turkish team shit unheard rebounding with a rapid recovery. I saw the ball hit the post twice in the same shot, the rebound wide area network and do not touch the front live, but hit a defender of the opposition keeps the job.

[Bubboy]

3 samples of these two situations is not a scientific method to prove anything. If you repeat the experiment 1000 times he charged, and 1000 times with the IA in office, and got the same results, maybe I could believe. But what you're doing is like a coin tossed three times, meaning heads, tails, but has three times, then handed the money to another person, and said that the tails of 3 times, and they succeeded. This does not prove that there is a conspiracy against him, it's just random chance.

[Wyl]

What he said about the win against Inter and the like, would be lack of patience in attacking play. Playing with three forwards from the start I guess you are using a narrow 4-1-2-3 tactic. I've seen the tactics really like this last year, and all are having the same problem: if the opponent is down and plays too narrow, noting require great individual efforts. There will still be plenty of one-on-one against the possibilities of the holder, but since if they are unable to defend the right program that 1-in-1 poor possibilities is the only way to ensure realistic results. So the facts of the FM are: tactics are deliberately fought to close one-on-one with the goalkeeper less potent than they should. Tactics are deliberately wide cross struggled to make the strikers inefficient. Thus, the FM11 game engine (and, presumably, FM12) is designed to punish a tactic that fits all approaches to the game and promote the further development of total communication, in other words, game by game and adjustments in games settings standardized tactical configurations. Moreover, from the assistant striker won and scored in the first game against Atlanta, the next two games cannot compare at all to the games he played. A loss means you're on your way to lose the next game too, since FM11 is based on forms. A striker is a striker not scoring entering the game does not mark below. A win and the scoring striker means that you will in the next game on the way to win, and the striker will be in the form of goal.

[Ashley Parker]

Possession of high, a lot of shots on goal, but goals are not ... is their tactics. The forwards are not getting probably in the right areas to score goals and splashing at a distance (just a guess).

[Bahumathi]

I was like that when I started ... then realized it was my tactic ... Then he remembered that the FM is just a football game and in real life is completely random too! I'd also bet that it works the other way and sometimes your opponent hitter and still finds a way to win...