Pros and Cons of Call of duty - World At War

[kraal]

Call of Duty - World At War

So I know the impressions of everyone (at least those who have tried) on the latest in a series of Call of duty.

For my part I am not at all enthusiastic. I think the game is similar to part 3 of the series only console output, and it is very slow, the maps available are quite responsible. Weapons are not realistic (lack of backing on some)...

In short I do not like it at all. I think this game will never get the success of "Modern Warfare".

What do you think?

[Rajesh4mLA]

I had played Call of Duty - Modern Warfare and it was great and fun to play. I recently got this new part of Call of Duty and I have not tried it yet. I will try it and will comment on it. By the way, is it multiplayer or just solo?

[kraal]

I think you have not seen the review link of Call of Duty - World At War in my previous post. It is clearly stated in the review that World At War offers the opportunity to cooperate upto four players. So four players can easily play the game online.

[arturro]

In my opinion CoD5: the sounds are pathetic, textures a little weird. We can no longer play "sound", ie around you listen to locate its enemy simply because there is a lag in sound and that the enemy is not just noticeable.