Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: New interface for photos by Facebook.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    39

    New interface for photos by Facebook.

    Facebbok has started new interface for photos which is quite attractive then old interface. Now in new interface user will get “like” and “Tag photo” button on the bottom left of the photo. Comment box is now moved to right side of the photo. Now there is a "Sponsored" advertisements located below comment box. Below you can see how it will look like.



    If anyone have more suggestion regarding this then let me know.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    395

    Re: New interface for photos by Facebook.

    Yes I really like this new interface and they have focused more on sponsor advertisement but overall it is very nice. It might be problem for the user with slow internet connection. Having like button and tag button at left bottom of photos is really nice.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    253

    Re: New interface for photos by Facebook.

    I don’t like this new interface at all. The earlier interface was much better because all the option was located below the photos which are more user friendly then current one. It is not good idea to focus more on sponsors.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 18-03-2012, 10:07 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-01-2012, 10:13 PM
  3. Facebook's new wall interface very bad
    By $Nakul$ in forum Technology & Internet
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-09-2011, 08:35 AM
  4. How can i get old Facebook Interface again
    By ProBaal in forum Technology & Internet
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 22-09-2011, 08:33 AM
  5. How to Share Photos on Facebook?
    By QUINEISHA in forum Technology & Internet
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26-02-2009, 08:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,180,595.04200 seconds with 16 queries