Custom photography website in iWeb

[Atticus]

I'm discussing which ways to walk off down, whether to accomplish the Photium/Clikpic thing otherwise try to make my personal website within iWeb 09. Seeing that a part-time, my photographs are not anything particular except I'd at rest like a polite looking site to showcase my superior stuff on, except I'm not excessively eager on the kind of sites you obtain through the iWeb templates. What my assumption is if anybody's managed to make somewhat that moves left from the customary iWeb look?

[Ransom]

After excursions into Flash or GoLive, I had to realize that we do know is proceeding with a half but fail quickly, so I present the appearance complete with iWeb to create, and of course on the contact form. What bothers me a little, the long load times, probably because I'm not web optimized every frame; I was assuming iweb, makes, since it will be for beginners with no prior knowledge. In addition, you can see on some pages and covers my guides, though I have painstakingly made sure everything lines to set the context, background and browser background in the same shade of gray. Otherwise I'm looking forward to your comments, tips and criticism.

[Kaufman]

While I foremost began my business I did make use of iWeb to make the site; though, I set up swiftly that it was fairly clunky while it came to running hundreds of pictures. I have attempted a couple of dissimilar websites except I ended up going through bludomain who makes flash websites meant for photographers and design kinds. Their essential website was $100 and an additional $100 for annual hosting. I’ve been pleased by them and I as well ended dissimilar designs which have all worked flawlessly.

[Appaji]

One can see that you've made an effort to go beyond the possibilities of iweb. For my taste, one could "click" a little less to get to the content, your photos. The photos are the most important at your site and should always be in the "center" of interest. The photo of you should also be significantly larger. You are the artist and interesting for the viewer. Otherwise very nice white and clean everything!

[Langward]

The whole idea of a program directly from iWeb drag is not very clever worked. You then get photos on formats that you often need quite right. Reduce fine people than December 1 Mp photo to a picture of 300 pixels wide. It is better to store images in advance about the right size to put before you get inside. So just export from Lightroom and then import them into iWeb. I have the whole media-box never used iWeb.

[Jokull]

With light cream can make a website that is simple and the photographs by category shows the parts by changing the text html, you can make it as a menu from one to another category. Also would you think flickr and wordpress or other blog / cms to use the photos to link it? I'm working on this possibility and you can do from flickr blogging, but have not checked how this works.

[Christina 80]

iWeb and further ready-made template-based web program packages are similar to immediate Cameras. The barely operative information they need is how to load, push the key and send out. And thus are their consequences. DreamWeaver is a step up, similar to current (D)SLRs outfitted with together automatic as well as manual modes. Big, luxurious and complex to make use of, except can at rest obtain one a rapid result.