Lack of Noscript and proper Ad-Blocking in Google Chrome

[Usha Kiran]

Google's continually lecturing that the Google chrome is the most secure browser. Also for the largest part it is. In conditions of the browser itself it is protected down plus unyielding. At rest, Chrome's defaulting is to download to a precise directory devoid of prompt. Drive by downloads will get benefit of this. Noscript would be a gigantic advantage to protection. While for ad-blocking, blocking ads would be an additional security bonus bearing in mind how accepted XSS attacks are.

[Akaashath]

NoScript arrives on Chrome. The popular extension for Firefox which allows you to block JavaScript, Java, Flash and other types of scripts before they are loaded by the browser finally finds its counterpart in the browser of Mountain View, but as usually happens with extensions for Chrome , there are a lot 'of limitations to spoil the party. However the latest news says that the Google is trying to add these things somehow in Chrome but i don't know why are they still waiting.

[Kaufman]

NoScript is one of the most used Firefox extensions, as it allows you to block Java, Flash, Javascript and other types of scripts before they are loaded by the browser. NotScript, does pretty much the same. Allows you to have control over what runs in your browser (iFrames, Javascript and even plugins) to reduce the effective CPU load and increase the safety of navigation. Once you have installed the extension, it will open a configuration page NotScripts. From here, you'll need a password to enter directly into the configuration file (something a little 'time-consuming for those not very experience

[Aashirya]

In addition to the small annoyance, is to be noted that NotScript suffers from some limitations imposed by way of functioning of the Google browser. As stated in the official add-on, NotScripts can block Flash, Silverlight and Java scripts embedded with EMBED otherwise OBJECT tag, except not those entered by the use of the APPLET tag. Same is unluckily true even meant for scripts embedded into HTML Web pages

[Savannah87]

Google Chrome, I find it particularly disturbing. If we had that to sell targeted advertising that Google is live, the new browser can no longer block cookies, ads, spyware business, it would be the beginning of a drift type really Big Brother. However, a priori, it is really the purpose of Google: IE 8 opposes allowing (as Firefox does) block hidden software to analyze behavior on the Internet private.

[Muwafaq]

Firefox owes part of its success to the extension mechanism that allows multiplying the functions of the browser. Most of these add-ons, however, are developed independently by programmers outside of the Mozilla project. That which in itself is a winning formula in some circumstances can be a double edged sword just as has happened in these days of Mussolini known extensions, AdBlock Plus (ad filter) and NoScript (script pages desgli control). Now google is trying to bring these things to Chrome with improved features.