|
| ||||||||||
| Tags: bsd, database, linux, mac os x, mysql, oracle, postgresql, rdbms, solaris, xml |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3
|
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3
Among the most interesting features in terms of performance, you will find:
Version 8.3 also includes many useful features for administrators and users alike:
|
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3 Quote:
|
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3
The following are some advantages of MySQL :
|
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3
This new version of PostgreSQL includes a large number of new features and enhancements, including more than 280 fixes and features such as checkpoint distributed, self-tuning of the writing process in the background, so the possibility of asynchronous commit. The latest version of this engine management databases just appeared, and comes with many new developments that place it as a valid alternative proposals regarding MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft. One of the major improvements is the integration of technology HOT (Heap Organized Tuples), which improves the performance of critical databases that are updated with a very high frequency. Other developments affecting the inclusion of so-called 'commits' asynchronous support, SQL / XML, text searches in the databases or the possibility of simultaneous scans on large databases. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3
PostgreSQL has always been a database with good performance, it is important to clarify because they are creating unfounded comments that greatly hurts bad reputation as an excellent quality software. The PostgreSQL installation defaults is not the most optimal in a PostgreSQL server must be properly configured for better performance and better utilize the features of the machine. That is a price to pay for a database, or any other product of considerable complexity and potential. Many people get to read between MySQL and PostgreSQL benchmarks made up of simple queries, without much complexity in their constraits and MySQL are winning, but they do not know is that the benchmark itself against Oracle, MySQL also win, ask yourself: does it MySQL makes faster than Oracle? "And / or better option?. Of course not. Note that this version has optimizations in extreme situations well, fairly frequent updates, is a case where solid database make their show, more simple elements MySQL continue to gain in performance. Bear this in mind when making a trial with this new version of PostgreSQL, not be heard to say, with great ignorance, "the truth was that performance did not rise much, MySQL is still faster". Do not confuse my statement with an anti-MySQL, MySQL is an excellent software and for certain solutions is a better choice of PostgreSQL, so you always have to evaluate the problem to recommend the best solution. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Improvements in PostgreSQL 8.3" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to install metasploit and postgresql in backtrack 5? | GaganGang | Operating Systems | 8 | 30-09-2011 12:51 PM |
| How to connect to Postgresql database | Xziibit | Software Development | 5 | 05-08-2011 02:01 PM |
| Postgresql vs Mysql database | Xmen | Software Development | 4 | 04-03-2010 09:11 PM |
| How to read from a PostgreSQL Python | Rebella | Software Development | 3 | 28-07-2009 03:38 PM |
| ClassNotFoundException Error in PostgreSQL | Nurhan | Software Development | 3 | 06-03-2009 11:51 AM |