|
| |||||||||
| Tags: larger, memory, paging, physical |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Paging file larger than physical memory
Hi I've run the Exchange BPA on one of my clients' SBS 2003 Server installation with Exchange SP2. One of the critical issues highlighted is "The space for the paging file (4092) is larger than the physical memory (2047). This may affect the system performance. It is recommended to have paging file size equal to the physical memory." The server has 2 GB of memory installed. On the Virtual Memory dialog page the "Total paging file size for all drives" is recommended to be set at 3069 MB, and is currently configured with Custom Size: initial size 2046 Maximum size 4092. The BPA help sends me to a KB (bb738135) article which states "The recommended page file size is equivalent to 1.05 times the RAM up to a maximum of 4,095 MB. This means that the largest paging file size per volume that you can set is 4,095 MB." When viewing some of the other articles listed at the bottom of bb738135 further advice suggests that 1.5 times (not 1.05 times) the installed memory is best. In fact that supports the recommended size stated in the Virtual Memory dialog. As these Microsoft issued articles appear to contradict themselves, can you tell me what the correct settings should be to satisfy both the Exchange BPA and the SBS server requirements. Thanks for your interest and help. Harvs |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: Paging file larger than physical memory
Anywhere between 1.5 and 2.0 will usually work quite well. There is a limit of 4GB per volume though. So if you have 4GB of physical RAM, you'd have to spread the Pagefile over a couple of volumes/drives -- Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP] Contributing Author, Windows Small Business Server 2008 Unleashed http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Small-...7269967&sr=8-1 ------------------------------------ MVPs do not work for Microsoft Please do not submit questions directly to me. "Harvs" <Harvs@community.nospam> wrote in message news:uXNZ2X%23bJHA.5412@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Hi > > I've run the Exchange BPA on one of my clients' SBS 2003 Server > installation with Exchange SP2. One of the critical issues highlighted is > "The space for the paging file (4092) is larger than the physical memory > (2047). This may affect the system performance. It is recommended to have > paging file size equal to the physical memory." > The server has 2 GB of memory installed. On the Virtual Memory dialog page > the "Total paging file size for all drives" is recommended to be set at > 3069 MB, and is currently configured with Custom Size: initial size 2046 > Maximum size 4092. > > The BPA help sends me to a KB (bb738135) article which states "The > recommended page file size is equivalent to 1.05 times the RAM up to a > maximum of 4,095 MB. This means that the largest paging file size per > volume that you can set is 4,095 MB." > > When viewing some of the other articles listed at the bottom of bb738135 > further advice suggests that 1.5 times (not 1.05 times) the installed > memory is best. In fact that supports the recommended size stated in the > Virtual Memory dialog. > > As these Microsoft issued articles appear to contradict themselves, can > you tell me what the correct settings should be to satisfy both the > Exchange BPA and the SBS server requirements. > > Thanks for your interest and help. > > Harvs > > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Paging file larger than physical memory
Ignore the BPA. Tradition in SBS is 1.5x ram. Server may be happier with 4 gigs of ram though. Ram can be very cheap right now. If you have a server motherboard it should take 4 gigs easily. On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:03:00 -0000, "Harvs" <Harvs@community.nospam> wrote: > >Hi > >I've run the Exchange BPA on one of my clients' SBS 2003 Server installation >with Exchange SP2. One of the critical issues highlighted is "The space for >the paging file (4092) is larger than the physical memory (2047). This may >affect the system performance. It is recommended to have paging file size >equal to the physical memory." >The server has 2 GB of memory installed. On the Virtual Memory dialog page >the "Total paging file size for all drives" is recommended to be set at 3069 >MB, and is currently configured with Custom Size: initial size 2046 Maximum >size 4092. > >The BPA help sends me to a KB (bb738135) article which states "The >recommended page file size is equivalent to 1.05 times the RAM up to a >maximum of 4,095 MB. This means that the largest paging file size per volume >that you can set is 4,095 MB." > >When viewing some of the other articles listed at the bottom of bb738135 >further advice suggests that 1.5 times (not 1.05 times) the installed memory >is best. In fact that supports the recommended size stated in the Virtual >Memory dialog. > >As these Microsoft issued articles appear to contradict themselves, can you >tell me what the correct settings should be to satisfy both the Exchange BPA >and the SBS server requirements. > >Thanks for your interest and help. > >Harvs > See what SBS support is working on http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/default.aspx Check your SBS with the SBS Best Practices Analyzer http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive...A/default.aspx |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Paging file larger than physical memory" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory | Fitz | Vista Help | 4 | 02-04-2009 09:49 AM |
| Larger dedicated memory | Suzlon | Motherboard Processor & RAM | 8 | 10-03-2009 12:29 AM |
| Virtual memory Paging file | Nebersek | Operating Systems | 3 | 05-12-2008 03:29 PM |
| Installed Physical Memory/Total Physical Memory | Roy69z | Vista Setup and Install | 1 | 06-06-2008 03:52 AM |
| Paging file size for a 16gb memory server. | Cyborg | Windows Server Help | 3 | 12-02-2008 04:22 AM |