The graphics card market does not stop moving ever. Approximately one year ago with the arrival of DirectX 11, AMD launched the first batch of graphics cards compatible with the new API from Microsoft. He did it with the Radeon HD 5800, which, in turn broke the market due to high yield (almost doubled in the strongest performance of the time), good temperature performance and low power they had. After that, no war between ATI and NVIDIA have not flared up and standing out new models in all ranges. The Radeon HD5800, despite having an excellent performance in all areas, there were too refined the qualities that made compatible with DirectX 11, including the Tessellation. AMD knew it and 3 months ago with the release of the Radeon HD 6800 showed some of the improvements achieved after one year of work. More than a month AMD introduced its new high-end graphics card, the AMD Radeon HD 6900. This new range has two distinct models, the Radeon HD 6950 and Radeon HD 6970. Both models, based on the new AMD chip Cayman have different technical characteristics. The Radeon HD 6950 shaders 1408 has a frequency of 800Mhz core and 5000Mhz memory. The Radeon HD 6970 has shader 1536, a core frequency of 880MHz and memory running at 5500Mhz.
This new generation of AMD graphics brings a major change in processor architecture-Stream. Go to VLIW4 VLIW5 format, this change makes the stream processors have a more complex architecture and more efficient. VLIW5 the architecture has a complex shader architecture 1 and 4 singles, this architecture can have 5 single-precision operations or double precision (double precision power is a ratio of 1 / 5 of total Stream Processors (SPs)). With VLIW4 happens to have a super complex and 3 singles, which can simultaneously execute an instruction or 2 double-precision single-precision (the power in double precision on a ratio of 1 / 4 (in relation to its total SPs)). Although it may seem that the yield has decreased compared to the previous generation, I must say that rarely graphics processing were achieved using all single-precision operations (except computer optimized processes), thus losing efficiency. With this new architecture increases efficiency since you can now choose to run the 5 single-precision instructions, or 1 double and three single precision.
With this reorganization, AMD says it can save up to 10% in the size of the chip and can be implemented more SIMD units. The ROPs are also faster, so they can double or performance of certain integer calculations and floating point respectively. The new Cayman chip design also provides for the separation of the graphics engine to allow it to work in parallel. Thanks to this parallel process AMD has managed to introduce to introduce a new Tessellation unit (identical to those of Barts), getting along with the Tessellation engine eighth-generation double the performance of the previous generation. Apart from internal redesigned, the new Radeon HD 6900 series includes multiple video outputs, including this time an HDMI 1.4a compatible with the new 3D technology. Total video outputs included are:
- 2 x MiniDP
- 1 x HDMI 1.4a
- 2 x DVI (SL + DL-DVI-DVI)
Several paragraphs and yet we have not said which card has come into our hands for testing. The jewel you're testing is nothing but the crown jewel of AMD: the Radeon HD 6970.
Tests
In this analysis we decided to compare the results with the Radeon HD 6970 AMD multihomed. The first is to happen as a single-GPU card more powerful AMD, which is none other than the Radeon HD 5870. The second is the Radeon HD 6850 we reviewed a few weeks ago and showed us so well. The benchmarks have been performed using our standard test equipment:
- Case: Corsair Obsidian 700D
- Microprocessor: AMD Phenom stepping C3 II 965 overclocked to 3.9Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P
- Cooler: Noctua NH-D14
- Memory: Corsair Dominator GT CMG4GX3M2B1600C7
- Power Supply: Antec TPQ 850w
- Sound Card: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
- Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst for HD 6850/5870 10.10 and 10.12 for the HD 6970.
In each test we placed first graphs of the results, then show a gallery with catches of the results in each of the cases analyzed. In the case of AVP is not impossible as the benchmark save the results to a text file and can not get a screenshot. All benchmarks we used are closed, meaning that you can run at home with your equipment to reliably compare results. These benchmarks, typically, companies create their own games or utilities created by third parties are easy to find on Google. There are three synthetic benchmarks such as 3DMark 11, 3DMark Vantage and Heaven Unigine 2.1. Which we use to see the raw power of the HD 6850 in different aspects.
Bookmarks