Printable View
The formations of the singing ability to turn pivot. The training, articulated to face another direction, while maintaining the training would be a welcome addition. And according to me more control training would be great if possible. Movement of air training units would also be a good addition. And the addition of crossing points would be a great addition too. What are your thoughts about this?
While it would be good for all units, IMO it would be useful for A / C, especially if it's one strike beyond the front lines, and the establishment of reconnaissance missions of the CAP and / AEW. I am for waypoint, and of course you can make one (two if you count the role of patrol) is undoubtedly an extension of an existing feature. BUT probably should be a limit to the number can be assigned by unit / group. Ways to curb speed units of the games work, so points could have a big impact.
I would also like to see someone able to be assigned to more than one unit as a front line target. Think forward, now pick up some of the planes you want to accompany the line, and now think about being able to assign units air escort multiple units of that line. The results, air units are moving back and forth with the remaining units are assigned to the accompanying moving from one to another and adjust their flight to continue doing so. In essence, an order of patrol also works as an order to escort the units being escorted to act as reference points of the patrol.
In my opinion better control is infinitely more desirable than having them circle looks alone. This can lead to an air leak in one attack, which if not entered / left the destination, it might just be some losses. For example: CAS flight squadron in the first line, but the a/c 30 km + circle behind enemy lines, and all AAA and CAP it is there, rather than just being exposed to so you can shoot in the hexagon goal.
I always thought it would be good squads were "united" to the airfields, and then you can set tasks in different areas such as circular, address, etc. You then have options to set how much of the range to operate and how many planes in the air at once, so the player must decide if they want more efficient squads or to cover a larger area. It would also help stop the player to lose track of the squadrons and units would be easier to transport that transport is provided at a particular airport, flying to pick up units from another airport in the range, refueling, and then the fate of the land units and back to base.
Would have to come home field, which is something that developers do not have bought for some reason. In any case, unfortunately they've gone in the opposite direction from east to this point, the "new" aircraft dispersal between fields adjustment made. This only really made it difficult to keep track of what was in it, without the use of bgs. Personally I favor home fields. And if we must even be (mostly) quiet if you add on orders for more automated and responses to the aircraft with this.
My opinion, money is not a problem aircraft when the other option has a drastic impact. Maybe just make the icon for a/c so that they spin move along the outer perimeter of the hexagon. The pattern of wasting time with it has more problems than the additional attacks from air units as opposed to; for example, there's also the issue of missiles in the way of wasting time an aircraft can move the missile off the scope of its target, preventing it from firing. Not sure I'm in a yet. And solution is not the point of losing the system maintains the current time active air unit’s very easy spot.
I think the solution to this could involve adjusting the SWR a bit. I like the BG ROE has but could be further improved to allow greater control of attack aircraft when reduced to the levels of attack by adding another level. Instead of just attacking ground units, choose a type of ground unit that can attack. Establish rules of engagement to the frame and the plane only goes down to prevent any attack by infantry and other units of land that goes above unless a unit of the hexagonal arms.