Shooting stuff in fable 3

Hey guys I'm new here, I loved all the games in Fable 2 is probably my favorite, this is mainly because I like to throw things, and the play of the gun was in his best moment in the tale of two loved me eing able choose from the arms of a man hole in the head after killing him with a shot in the chest, where did the child in order to go in the story of three is not a single head saw a robber fly and land at her feet, friends The shooting in the story of three seemed way to basic single target and pull the trigger, in the longer if you want a better chance, no one will miss the secondary objective?

I miss both sub-goals. I think it was carried out in order to attend a game less hardcore audience. During the development phase of Fable 3, there was much emphasis on make simpler the game, appropriate to the fact that a lot of people playing Fable 2 I thought that some of the features were too complex and not just with them. It's probably the only thing that bothered me about the combat system in the fable of three, as I am in favor of skills such as discipline and the elimination of sub-goal that has adopted some of the skill, strategy and overall feel as shooter incredible shots. Hopefully they will put it back in the Fable IV.

I also miss the sub with the objective of weapons in Fable 2, I loved seeing the protruding limbs and heads do not know why the developers decided not to include it in Fable 3, but I know many fans would like to see again (it discussed from time to time.) Hopefully future versions, once again we choose to shoot your enemies in the same "family jewels." What I love the special kills with weapons and shoot the bandits feet making him dance a bit before killing him, but no match for the beheading with a single bullet.

It makes the game easier to understand - that is, makes the controls seem less complicated by removing it. The reason is removed so that the control system more flexible and easier to use - I do not think there was any point including the optional things that people were not using. That is a huge penalty? I do not think it has anything to do with the exploitation of headshots, because otherwise we should have removed the load to magic spells and the ability to flourish with melee weapons (all of which provide a stronger attack in that discipline at the expense of having to remain stationary, while "load" up / target).

It's the same with me. Well Fable II was the first game I got to 360. Do not get angry about the fight just like a lot of other people. But I wish we could make the game more difficult. But dumping down with Fable III really bothered me. I liked Fable III. But I felt like I was holding my hand all the time. And how slow things have. The games were coming to an end as soon as you have some of the clothes and dyes. There was insufficient material from the beginning.

Well, to make the game more accessible to the casual gaming crowd, Lionhead has to make certain design decisions. While taking out the sub-aiming possibly will have made the combat easier for people latest to the series, in addition it is partly alienated those who enjoyed that aspect of ranged combat. I think it would have been better if they had taken an option on whether you want to have sub-goal or not during the game through. But these are sacrifices that have to do when you want to serve a wider audience.

Head and crotch shots in my favorites. I tried to sub goal of the first night I have the game and was nervous when combined button did not work. I was like. Anyway, I have adjusted and like the moon have tried to figure out what I'm doing for the movements that have just occurred. Cannot decide if it's purely random on the basis of arms and the hero's level is at or if it is a matter of time. But I like the movement, where my hero points his gun behind it and makes a blind shot hit the hobby, or whatever creature is attacking.