Olympus E-P2 VS Olympus E-P3

[Gimbya]

Hello I am just finish the graduation and now I am going for holiday for 2 months and I searching for the good camera. I have gone through the website and I have decided to get the Olympus branded company but I not able to decide which one to choose either Olympus E-P3 or Olympus E-P2 camera. Now I need to know the all features and specification of these both the camera. Can anyone suggest on this issue and so that I can solve mine issue.

[Luis234]

The E-P2 is truly comparative to its ancestor the E-P1, but a major update is the look of the form. While the E-P1 had a white / silver form, the E-P2 emphasizes a significantly greater looking dark metal figure. Still a spot too stylish for my taste, and particularly with unnecessary fineries for example "OLYMPUS PEN Since 1959" engraved on a top board. In any case it’s still much perfect to the somewhat decadent look of the E-P1. Assemble value and material completion seems, by all accounts, to be entirely elevated, in keeping with the camera's cost (U.S. $1,100). There is a leatherette cushioned zone where ones right hand's fingers hold, and it feels great, but the for the most part nonessential advance of the picture clicker is somewhat lessened by there being too countless diverse surface sorts, textures, and color.

[killerboy]

At this cost, styling is exceptionally noteworthy and the E-P3 sensibly holds the look of the old PEN picture clickers from the 60s. We spent most incredibly time with the pearlescent white version, but if you’re not prepared for that sort of style proclamation you are able to pick from the more sober dark or classy silver choices. It feels unyielding, wrapped in an intermingle of metal and metal-ish materials. Olympus' Micro Four Thirds lenses are entirely plastic, which a container a small but keeps them light and stays away from the camera ending up being front-great.

[Jacob.d]

The size of human hands is a confining element in the plan of countless items, and on account of advanced picture clickers its essential to strike a parity in the middle of little size, the ergonomics of the units controls, and handy issues for example screen and control size and positioning. The E-P2 gets it about right, offers a great trade off by being vast enough to keep easily yet not so modest as to make control utilize risky. The zoom lens' Mode dial right on the top other side of the frame is a model of decent objective. It is plainly visible, yet in light of the fact that the changing ring is covered underneath the top board, with just an edge to be turned by thumb, it will never be inadvertently mis-positioned.

[HiSpeed]

The Olympus E-P3 touchscreen might be isolated into a few sorts, resistive and capacitive. Resistive screens have a few electrically conductive layers that are disconnected by a restricted crevice. When a finger or stylus presses the proposed several layers as one unit, the touch is located and the gadget reacts subsequently. Panasonic utilizes resistive touchscreen in its picture clickers. Capacitive screens have an electrically conductive surface covering and touching this with human skin, which is likewise conductive, updates the capacitance and triggers a reaction. Fruit utilizes a capacitive screen in its Iphone

[GaganjyotTechie]

The E-P2 is equitably straightforward. HDMI and USB connectors are under an entryway on the right side, and electric storage device and SD card are in the common put under an entryway on the base. The tripod string is not placed focused to the lens, which would be an issue for those doing discriminating panos. The LCD screen is spendid enough in every last item not counting administer daylight, but as with that on the E-P1 is truly easy res contrasted with much of the rivalry. Not to the purpose of being unpalatable, actually not up to the present standard.